2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2008.09.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solute rejection by porous thin film composite nanofiltration membranes at high feed water recoveries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The equations (14) and (15) The membranes properties are usually determined by retention of ion i -R i (16) and permeate fl ux J P (17). (16) (17) where R i is the retention of ion i [%], c i,p is the concentration of ion in permeate [mol m -3 ], c i,w is the concentration of ion i in the feed [mol m -3 and characterized by pH ≈ 4 were investigated.…”
Section: Dsp Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The equations (14) and (15) The membranes properties are usually determined by retention of ion i -R i (16) and permeate fl ux J P (17). (16) (17) where R i is the retention of ion i [%], c i,p is the concentration of ion in permeate [mol m -3 ], c i,w is the concentration of ion i in the feed [mol m -3 and characterized by pH ≈ 4 were investigated.…”
Section: Dsp Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After analysing of the literatures data 15- 25 we have stated that both theoretical and experimental works concerning the ions separation mechanism into nanofi ltration membranes are not still satisfactory and require further actions. Recently the modelling of nanofi ltration of salt solution has been widely investigated [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] . The mass transfer through the membrane was described by different models such as Kedem-Katchalsky 19, 20 or Spiegler-Kedem 19, 21, 25 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For binary salt solutions (e.g., NaCl only) at fi xed pH, rejection primarily depends on the effective membrane pore size (due to steric effects), the ratio of membrane charge density to salt concentration, and permeate fl ux [21,22]. In general, ion rejection increases with increasing ion size and decreasing effective pore radius (steric effect), increasing salt valence (Donnan exclusion), decreasing salt concentration for a fi xed membrane surface charge (Donnan exclusion, Figure 4.2), and increasing permeate fl ux.…”
Section: Ion Rejectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is often described as a 'black-box' model as the two model coeffi cients (σ and P) encompass the structural and electrical properties of the membrane and solute that infl uence rejection. Recently, Sharma and Chellam [21] used the phenomenological model to predict the removal of organic matter and salts by NF treatment of surface water at high system recoveries. For example, describing salt rejection by NF requires characterization of σ and P through experimentation and model fi tting with the water matrix and membrane of interest.…”
Section: Irreversible Thermodynamic or Phenomenological Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the literature data [5,7,8] and our own investigations [6,9], one of the most important and interesting research area of nanofiltration is separation of chromium (III) from acidic salt solutions. The nanofiltration membrane in such processes, according to its properties, becomes non-permeable for multi-charged ions and permeable for one-charged anions and cations [10][11][12]. That is why nanofiltration seems to be a promising process allowing for effective and efficient treatment of chromium tannery wastewater [5,6,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%