2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solution and vapour deposited lead perovskite solar cells: Ecotoxicity from a life cycle assessment perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
215
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(225 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
9
215
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This will inevitably cause potential environmental concerns for large-scale solar cell devices. [45][46][47] Consequently, it is of great interest to find alternative halide perovskites consisting of completely inorganic components having good stability and meanwhile made of less toxic elements. .The red squares mean the materials passing the screening (Selected) and the green ones mean not passing (Abandoned).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will inevitably cause potential environmental concerns for large-scale solar cell devices. [45][46][47] Consequently, it is of great interest to find alternative halide perovskites consisting of completely inorganic components having good stability and meanwhile made of less toxic elements. .The red squares mean the materials passing the screening (Selected) and the green ones mean not passing (Abandoned).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25][26][27][28][29] Recently, a comparison of PSCs with silicon solar cells and a tandem with both perovskite and silicon was implemented. 30 Furthermore, the four most common methods to produce PSCs were environmentally revised by us.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It thus becomes important to investigate the potential risks associated to the health and environment related to Pb content. 214,215 There has been much discussion about replacing Pb with other elements such as Sn to overcome the potential toxicity and environmental impacts. However whereas efficiencies above 20% have been reported for CH 3 Not only the fact that tin metal is 6.3 times more expensive than lead, but, from the life-cycle perspective, the environmental impacts caused by tin based PSCs (accounting material extraction and device fabrication) produced on a functional scale (1 kW h) were estimated to be nearly double to that of lead based PSCs.…”
Section: Life Cycle Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The environmental impacts (EI) of PV technology can be classified in three categories: (i) toxicity (cancer, non-cancer and human health), (ii) fresh water contamination, and (iii) resource depletion. 215 These include not only material extraction, resource utilization during manufacturing of PVs and the impact during lifetime but also the life-cycle during or after disposal via landfill or incineration. In term of resource depletion, f-PSCs offer advantages over glass based counterparts reducing EI by B40% (mainly by reduction in energy required for ETL annealing and FTO/ITO substrates heating/cleaning) 214 and also during re-cycling, thus reducing CO 2 footprint.…”
Section: Life Cycle Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%