We extended the oil compatibility
model to the dissolution of asphaltenes
(Asps) in maltenes from 10 crude oils (COs). As scales for the power
of solvents of interest, vide infra, we used solvatochromic parameters,
calculated from the UV–vis spectra of solvatochromic compounds
(probes), Hildebrand/Hansen solubility parameters, and the colloidal
instability index of COs. As the colors of maltenes or asphaltene-free
crude oils CO(Asp‑free) were too dark to permit recording
the absorption spectra of the probes, we formulated models for these
fractions (MCO(Asp‑free)). They were composed
of low molar mass hydrocarbons, namely, cis and trans decalines, isooctane, 1-methylnaphthalene and, as
model for resins, benzothiazole/n-octyl-1-naphthoate.
We based formulations of these MCO(Asp‑free) on SARA analysis of the COs and elemental analysis of the corresponding
resins. We validated MCO(Asp‑free) as models
for the corresponding CO(Asp‑free) by showing that the
correlation between Hildebrand solubility parameter (δt) of (COs) and δt for MCO(Asp‑free) is linear with a slope close to unity. Regarding Asp dissolution,
we show that the correlations between log(dissolved Asp, mass %) and
each of the following solvent descriptors is linear: empirical polarity
of MCOs(Asp‑free); δt of
COs; colloidal instability index of COs. Furthermore, the multiple
correlation between log(dissolved Asp, mass %) and other solvatochromic
parameters showed that solvent dipolarity and polarizability are important
factors for Asp dissolution, in agreement with our previous results
on Asp dissolution in pure solvents. The formulation of a model that
successfully mimics maltenes is potentially very useful, e.g., in
rationalizing the efficiency of certain classes of additives employed
for Asp stabilization.