“…On the other hand, the diaminocarbene complexes 2 Et2 and 2 iPr2 are oxidized reversibly to [2 Et2 ] + and [2 iPr2 ] + at 105 and 115 mV vs. ferrocene in CH 2 Cl 2 /[ n Bu 4 N][B(C 6 F 5 ) 4 ], respectively (Supporting Information, Figures S16-S19). These values are lower by 440-475 mV compared to that of the [1] + /1 and chlorido (ferrocenyl Fischer carbene) gold(I) redox couples, [41] but at typical potentials of N-substituted ferrocenes, [68] Nferrocenyl amides, thioamides, [72] ureas, thioureas [73] or chlorido Fc-MIC gold(I) complexes. [44] Consequently, the oxidation process is assigned to the ferrocene/ferrocenium redox couple, rather than an Au II/I couple.…”