2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-4332(03)00955-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solution grown PbS nanoparticle films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this viewpoint, PbS has been grown in various forms by different techniques such as chemical bath deposition (CBD), vacuum evaporation, spray pyrolysis, electrodeposition, etc. [3][4][5][6]. Among these techniques, CBD offers simple, cost effective, and industrially scalable route for the production of high-quality films, without the need for high-deposition temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this viewpoint, PbS has been grown in various forms by different techniques such as chemical bath deposition (CBD), vacuum evaporation, spray pyrolysis, electrodeposition, etc. [3][4][5][6]. Among these techniques, CBD offers simple, cost effective, and industrially scalable route for the production of high-quality films, without the need for high-deposition temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mixed cationic/anionic surfactants reverse-micelle solutions were also used in synthesis of morphology-controlled one-dimensional nanostructures and hierarchical architectures at low temperature [16][17][18]. Using reverse-micelle and microemulsion nanoreactors for the preparation of PbS nanocrystals has also been reported [19,20]. Uniform PbS nanocubes have been synthesized by using a surfactant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The band gap of CuS nanocrystals has been reported to be in the range between 1.25 and 2.81 eV (Mageshwari et al 2011;Nair et al 1998;Raevskaya et al 2004;Yildirim et al 2009). The band gap of PbS nanocrystals has been reported to be in the range 0.5-2.32 eV (Joshi et al 2004;Mukherjee et al 1994;Nanda et al 2002) and even as high as 5.2 eV (Thielsch et al 1998). Although the exact band gaps of CuS and PbS ultrafine grains formed on the surface of ZnS cores are unknown, we assume that the electron and hole transfer from the excited ZnS to the energy levels of PbS may be faster than to that of CuS, bringing about the quicker fluorescence quenching by Pb 2?…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%