2011
DOI: 10.7763/ijcee.2011.v3.407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solution of Economic Load Dispatch Problem with Smooth and Non-Smooth Fuel Cost Functions Including Line Losses Using Genetic Algorithm

Abstract: Abstract-The paper presents an application of Genetic Algorithm (GA) to solve Economic Load Dispatch (ELD) problems with smooth and non-smooth fuel cost objective functions. Main objective of ELD is to determine the most economic generating dispatch required to satisfy the predicted load demands including line losses over a certain period of time while relaxing various equality and inequality constraints. The unit Min/Max operational constraints, effects of valve-point loading ripples and line losses are consi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We optimize our system using GA technique; an established global optimization method based on natural selection that is derived from biological evolution [15]. One of the advantages of using GA is its ability to handle large amount of variables whether in continuous or discrete format regardless of how complex the cost function is.…”
Section: Genetic Algorithm Optimization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We optimize our system using GA technique; an established global optimization method based on natural selection that is derived from biological evolution [15]. One of the advantages of using GA is its ability to handle large amount of variables whether in continuous or discrete format regardless of how complex the cost function is.…”
Section: Genetic Algorithm Optimization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is obvious that the proposed CSA has good convergence characteristics as it converges in relatively fewer iterations. [24] 15450.00 15454.00 15492.00 GA [24] 15459.00 15469.00 15524.00 CSA [25] 15449…”
Section: Test Case 1: 6-unit Test Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%