2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00419-010-0405-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solution of free vibration equations of semi-rigid connected Reddy–Bickford beams resting on elastic soil using the differential transform method

Abstract: The literature regarding the free vibration analysis of Bernoulli-Euler and Timoshenko beams under various supporting conditions is plenty, but the free vibration analysis of Reddy-Bickford beams with variable cross-section on elastic soil with/without axial force effect using the Differential Transform Method (DTM) has not been investigated by any of the studies in open literature so far. In this study, the free vibration analysis of axially loaded and semi-rigid connected Reddy-Bickford beam with variable cr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the FBT violates the zero shear stress conditions on the top and bottom surfaces of the beam, a shear correction factor is required to account for the discrepancy between the actual stress state and the assumed constant stress state [4][5][6][7]. To avoid the use of a shear correction factor and have a better prediction of response of FG beams, higher-order shear deformation theories have been proposed, notable among them are the third-order theory of Reddy [8][9][10][11][12], the sinusoidal theory of Touratier [13], the hyperbolic theory of Soldatos [14], the exponential theory of Karama et al [15], and the unified formulation of Carrera [16][17]. Higher-order shear deformation theories can be developed based on the assumption of a higher-order variation of axial displacement through the depth of the beam [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] or both axial and transverse displacements through the depth of the beam (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the FBT violates the zero shear stress conditions on the top and bottom surfaces of the beam, a shear correction factor is required to account for the discrepancy between the actual stress state and the assumed constant stress state [4][5][6][7]. To avoid the use of a shear correction factor and have a better prediction of response of FG beams, higher-order shear deformation theories have been proposed, notable among them are the third-order theory of Reddy [8][9][10][11][12], the sinusoidal theory of Touratier [13], the hyperbolic theory of Soldatos [14], the exponential theory of Karama et al [15], and the unified formulation of Carrera [16][17]. Higher-order shear deformation theories can be developed based on the assumption of a higher-order variation of axial displacement through the depth of the beam [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] or both axial and transverse displacements through the depth of the beam (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, in the further authors' work the investigations conducted in this paper will be extended to the cases of Timoshenko and Reddy‐Bickford beams (see e.g. []).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… https://dx.doi.org/10.18400/tekderg.408772 Timoshenko beams resting on Winkler type foundation and verified by the analytical results. Yeşilce et al used the DTM for the free vibration analysis of axially loaded Reddy-Bickford beams [7][8]. Sapountzakis and Kampitsis [9] investigated the nonlinear behavior of the beams partially supported by tensionless Winkler foundation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%