2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solution of Stokes flow in complex nonsmooth 2D geometries via a linear-scaling high-order adaptive integral equation scheme

Abstract: We present a fast, high-order accurate and adaptive boundary integral scheme for solving the Stokes equations in complex-possibly nonsmooth-geometries in two dimensions. The key ingredient is a set of panel quadrature rules capable of evaluating weakly-singular, nearly-singular and hyper-singular integrals to high accuracy. Near-singular integral evaluation, in particular, is done using an extension of the scheme developed in J. Helsing and R. Ojala, J. Comput. Phys. 227 (2008) 2899-2921. The boundary of the g… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the channel size between bundles of fiber cloth was less than 100 um, so the Stokes flow equation could be used for numerical simulation [ 54 , 55 ]. The Stokes flow equation is mainly applied to micro-fluid flow with extremely small geometry size, which is another manifestation of the Navier–Stokes equation [ 56 , 57 , 58 ], ignoring the inertia term.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the channel size between bundles of fiber cloth was less than 100 um, so the Stokes flow equation could be used for numerical simulation [ 54 , 55 ]. The Stokes flow equation is mainly applied to micro-fluid flow with extremely small geometry size, which is another manifestation of the Navier–Stokes equation [ 56 , 57 , 58 ], ignoring the inertia term.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The operators in (43) are discretized by splitting Γ and γ uniformly into M Γ and M γ disjoint panels respectively. In each panel, a p-th order Gauss-Legendre quadrature is employed to evaluate smooth integrals while a local panel-wise close evaluation scheme of [26] is employed to accurately handle corrections for the singularities of S(x, y), T D (x, y) and P D (x, y). A forward Euler time-stepping scheme is used to evolve the particle position and the solution procedure outlined above is repeated at each time-step.…”
Section: Boundary Integral Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if the density has regions where refinement is needed (such as corners or close interactions with other bodies), a composite ("panel") scheme is better, as is common with Galerkin boundary-element methods [44]. On each panel a high-order representation (such as the Lagrange basis for a set of Gauss-Legendre nodes) is used; panels may then be split in either a graded [24,36,44] or adaptive [37,41,50] fashion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%