1970
DOI: 10.1115/1.3449606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solution of the Incompressible Turbulent Boundary-Layer Equations With Heat Transfer

Abstract: The boundary-layer equations for laminar and turbulent incompressible flows about two-dimensional and axisymmetric flows are solved by an implicit finite-difference method. An eddy-viscosity concept is used to eliminate the Reynolds shear-stress term, and an eddy-conductivity concept is used to eliminate the time mean of the product of fluctuating velocity and temperature. Several flows have been computed by this method, and comparisons with experimental data and with the Bradshaw-Ferriss method are made. In g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

1976
1976
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 9 shows the predictions of skin-friction for BT flow with the different turbulence models described above. In the fully turbulent region where acceleration is not very high (x < x 0 ), both MLM and MLM-PG (MLM with pressure-gradient modifications suggested in [24]) show good match with the experimental data but all of them fail conspicuously in the relaminarizing region. MLM-PG does only slightly better than MLM in this region.…”
Section: Turbulent Boundary Layermentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 9 shows the predictions of skin-friction for BT flow with the different turbulence models described above. In the fully turbulent region where acceleration is not very high (x < x 0 ), both MLM and MLM-PG (MLM with pressure-gradient modifications suggested in [24]) show good match with the experimental data but all of them fail conspicuously in the relaminarizing region. MLM-PG does only slightly better than MLM in this region.…”
Section: Turbulent Boundary Layermentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The wall layer MLM is the well-known Prandtl-Van Driest mixing length model, with damping length constant A + = 26. Cebeci and Smith [24] introduced modifications in this model to account for the pressure gradient in the flow, taking the constant as A + = 26/N, where N = (1 + 11.8∆ p ) 1/2 .…”
Section: Turbulent Boundary Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexity inherent in the calculation of boundary layers has motivated researchers to improve existing numerical procedures until accurate numerical predictions of the experimental data, coupled with small computing costs could be met. Typical studies can be found in Pletcher (1969), Patankar and Spalding (1970), Cebeci et al (1970), Dyban and Fridman (1987), Zincheno and Fedorova (1987), Shishov (1991), Susec and Oljaca (1995), Hori and Yata (1997), Volino and Simon (1997) and Silva Freire (1999). In these works, quite satisfactory numerical results have been obtained for both skin friction and heat transfer coefficients in turbulent boundary layers of incompressible fluids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The absence of any statement regarding initial conditions is particularly a problem when interpreting the results of a method like Cebeci's (1,8,9). His method is started from a leading edge or virtual origin and is terminated when the numerical solution "matches" experimental data.…”
Section: The Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%