“…In particular, pertinent quantities showed a divergence at m = 1/4, a value that could not be excluded as being unphysical. The solution to the problem turned out to be a third term in the expansion that is related to the gradient of the distribution of deposited energy, which likewise shows a divergence at m = 1/4, but which cancels the divergence in the momentum-related term [66,67,56]. This term was also neglected in a successful semiempirical approach [68], but the effect of the omission was limited due to the use of adjustable parameters.…”