1995
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/7/32/004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solution of the kinetic equation for the deposited momentum distribution. II. Threshold energy effects

Abstract: The p a p continues an investigation of the depth distribution of momenNm deposited in solids by ion bombardment. finite-threshold-energy effects being discussed. It is shown that, for a wide set of system parameters, existing semianalytical techniques lead to a qualitatively inoarreet description of momentum deposition, especially in the target surface region. The most important qualitative -res of the deposited momentum distribution are considered, which cannot be ignored when finding solutions of the kineti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, pertinent quantities showed a divergence at m = 1/4, a value that could not be excluded as being unphysical. The solution to the problem turned out to be a third term in the expansion that is related to the gradient of the distribution of deposited energy, which likewise shows a divergence at m = 1/4, but which cancels the divergence in the momentum-related term [66,67,56]. This term was also neglected in a successful semiempirical approach [68], but the effect of the omission was limited due to the use of adjustable parameters.…”
Section: The Leading Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, pertinent quantities showed a divergence at m = 1/4, a value that could not be excluded as being unphysical. The solution to the problem turned out to be a third term in the expansion that is related to the gradient of the distribution of deposited energy, which likewise shows a divergence at m = 1/4, but which cancels the divergence in the momentum-related term [66,67,56]. This term was also neglected in a successful semiempirical approach [68], but the effect of the omission was limited due to the use of adjustable parameters.…”
Section: The Leading Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%