1996
DOI: 10.1021/tx9500787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solution Structure of an Oligodeoxynucleotide Containing the Human N-ras Codon 12 Sequence Refined from 1H NMR Using Molecular Dynamics Restrained by Nuclear Overhauser Effects

Abstract: The structure of d(GGCAGGTGGTG).d(CACCACCTGCC), consisting of codons 11, 12 (underlined), and 13 of the human n-ras protooncogene, was refined from 1H NMR data. Patterns of internucleotide NOEs consistent with a B-form helix were observed for each strand. NOE intensities between purine H8 and H1' protons were small compared to intensities between cytosine H5 and H6 protons, indicative of glycosyl torsion angles in the anti range. Cross-peaks were observed between purine H8 and pyrimidine H5 and CH3 protons on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20,21 The 10R(Ϫ)-trans-anti adduct structure shown is essentially the same as that of the NMR solution structure of Zegar et al 22 determined in the same C[A*]A sequence context of codon 61 of the human N-ras gene.…”
Section: Adduct Structuressupporting
confidence: 57%
“…20,21 The 10R(Ϫ)-trans-anti adduct structure shown is essentially the same as that of the NMR solution structure of Zegar et al 22 determined in the same C[A*]A sequence context of codon 61 of the human N-ras gene.…”
Section: Adduct Structuressupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The 3′-neighbor G‚C base pair inserts the guanine exocyclic NH 2 group into the minor groove; thus, accommodation of the styrenyl moiety within the minor groove and in the 3′-direction requires a shift in base stacking at the adduct site. Modeling suggests that the modified base pair R-SO G‚C shifts toward the minor groove as compared to the corresponding G‚C base pair in the unmodified ras12 oligodeoxynucleotide (24). In contrast, with the R(12,2) adduct, the 3′-neighbor T‚A base pair does not hinder accommodation of the styrenyl moiety within the minor groove and in the 3′-direction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The greatest changes in chemical shifts were observed for G 6 (Figure 5), in the 3′-direction from the adduct site. Upfield chemical shifts of 0.3, 0.6, and 0.5 ppm were observed for G 6 H8, H1′, and H2′′, respectively, relative to the unmodified oligomer (24). Also, a 0.4 ppm downfield chemical shift was noted for R-SO G 5 H1′.…”
Section: Spectral Assignments (A) the R(121) Adductmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The NMR solution structures of these diastereomeric B­[ a ]­PDE- N 6 -adenine adducts (dA*) in double-stranded oligonucleotides have been evaluated in the CA*C ,,, and CAA* ,,,, sequence contexts and are very different from those of the N 2 -guanine adducts. In the case of the 10 R (−)- trans -B­[ a ]­PDE- N 6 –dA adduct, all Watson–Crick base pairs, including the modified dA*:dT base pair, are intact. , The dA* residue is predominantly (95%) in the anti glycosidic bond conformation that is in equilibrium with a minor syn conformation.…”
Section: Excision Of Different Forms Of Dna Damage By Human Ner Syste...mentioning
confidence: 99%