1998
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.273.35.22471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solution Structure of Eotaxin, a Chemokine That Selectively Recruits Eosinophils in Allergic Inflammation

Abstract: The solution structure of the CCR3-specific chemokine, eotaxin, has been determined by NMR spectroscopy. The quaternary structure of eotaxin was investigated by ultracentrifugation and NMR, and it was found to be in equilibrium between monomer and dimer under a wide range of conditions. At pH < 5 and low ionic strength, eotaxin was found to be predominantly a monomer. The three-dimensional structure of the eotaxin monomer solved at pH 5.0 revealed that it has a typical chemokine fold, which includes a 3-strand… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

11
103
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
11
103
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lkn-1 is a truncated form of MIP-1ˇ, with the N-terminal 24 amino acids deleted. Furthermore, when the primary structures of the five chemokines used in this study are compared it is apparent that MIP-1 § , MCP-3, RANTES and Lkn-1 have between seven and ten amino acids N-terminal to the first two cysteine residues (the CC motif), as opposed to the 31 residues of MIP-1ˇ [25]. Interestingly, mutational analyses of MCP-3 and RANTES have shown that the residues N-terminal to the CC motif are critical for the effective induction of THP-1 monocyte cells but not for receptor binding [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lkn-1 is a truncated form of MIP-1ˇ, with the N-terminal 24 amino acids deleted. Furthermore, when the primary structures of the five chemokines used in this study are compared it is apparent that MIP-1 § , MCP-3, RANTES and Lkn-1 have between seven and ten amino acids N-terminal to the first two cysteine residues (the CC motif), as opposed to the 31 residues of MIP-1ˇ [25]. Interestingly, mutational analyses of MCP-3 and RANTES have shown that the residues N-terminal to the CC motif are critical for the effective induction of THP-1 monocyte cells but not for receptor binding [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This binding step is followed by contact of the N-terminal residues of the chemokine with the receptor. The N-terminal region is considered to mediate activation of the receptor into a conformation that is able to functionally interact with effectors [25]. It is therefore tempting to speculate that the long N-terminal region of MIP-1ˇis unable to activate CCR1 as efficiently as do other agonists, despite being able to bind the receptor with high affinity due to its structural homology to other CC chemokines in the N-loop region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, none of the sulfated compounds tested, including PI-88, could block eotaxin binding to heparin. Eotaxin also exists as a homodimer (37), so it is likely that the appropriately spaced sulfated motifs were not present in the limited family of sulfated molecules tested. Sulfated cyclitol linker length was also critical for LpL binding inhibition, although in this case a very short spacer was required for optimal inhibitory activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The receptor binding and activation data are summarized in Table I. DISCUSSION Previous chemokine mutational studies, and their interpretation according to the prevailing two-step model for chemokine receptor activation, have suggested a separation of function between the N-loop and N-terminal regions of chemokines (21,(23)(24)(25). The N-loop is proposed to be important for providing the initial binding energy, whereas the N-terminus is suggested to be required for triggering receptor activation subsequent to binding.…”
Section: Selection Of Residues Formentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Extensive mutational studies of several chemokines have led to a proposed "two-step" model for receptor interaction in which the N-loop of the chemokine initially binds to the receptor then the N-terminal region of the chemokine docks with the receptor to induce a conformational change, resulting in receptor activation (21,(23)(24)(25). Recent papers describing the binding of receptor-derived peptides to a groove located between the Nloop and ␤2-␤3 hairpin of their cognate chemokines (interleukin-8, fractalkine, eotaxin, and eotaxin-2) have reinforced the importance of the N-loop region for receptor binding (22, 26 -28).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%