1996
DOI: 10.1021/bi960535y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solution Structures of 5-Fluorouracil-Substituted DNA and RNA Decamer Duplexes

Abstract: The structures in solution of eight oligonucleotide duplexes each containing either zero, one, or two 5-fluorodeoxyuridine (FdUrd) or 5-fluorouridine (FUrd) nucleosides were determined by the combined use of NMR spectroscopy, restrained molecular dynamics, and full relaxation matrix refinement to determine how FdUrd and FUrd substitution affects the structure of duplex DNA and RNA and to establish whether structural differences due to FdUrd and FUrd substitution in nucleic acids may be responsible, in part, fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, changes in chromatin architecture or gene regulation patterns could be important determinants of antimetabolite therapy. Structural analysis of synthetic DNA showed that incorporation of nucleoside analogs into DNA does not introduce gross changes in DNA geometry (Sahasrabudhe et al, 1996;Somerville et al, 2003). Instead, drastic shifts in DNA dynamics occur; for example, incorporation of deoxythioguanosine makes DNA more flexible (Somerville et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, changes in chromatin architecture or gene regulation patterns could be important determinants of antimetabolite therapy. Structural analysis of synthetic DNA showed that incorporation of nucleoside analogs into DNA does not introduce gross changes in DNA geometry (Sahasrabudhe et al, 1996;Somerville et al, 2003). Instead, drastic shifts in DNA dynamics occur; for example, incorporation of deoxythioguanosine makes DNA more flexible (Somerville et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several antimetabolite agents do not disrupt integrity of DNA and lead only to minute alterations in DNA geometry (Sahasrabudhe et al, 1996;Somerville et al, 2003). Instead, incorporation of these chemical moieties into DNA increases local flexibility of the double helix in the area surrounding the modification, and changes the DNA-protein interactions (Krynetskaia et al, 2000;Somerville et al, 2003;Seibert et al, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the DNA level, FdU substitution has been reported to enhance base pair opening (43) and to form stable ionized and wobble base pairs with dG in duplex DNA (44). The nuclear magnetic resonance structure of an FdU-substituted DNA duplex shows alteration in base roll at the site of FdU substitution (45). The structural distortions resulting from FdU:dG base pairs probably account for the enhancement of Top1-mediated DNA cleavage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spectroscopic studies have shown that the solution structure of FUra-substituted DNA duplexes is quite different from that of Ura-substituted duplexes. 42 In addition, thymine-DNA glycosylase, an enzyme involved in base excision repair, has been shown to remove FUra from DNA more efficiently than it removes Ura. [43][44][45][46] Therefore, FUra and Ura may have very different downstream consequences when incorporated into DNA, a scenario that may help explain tumor induction by RTX, and tumor inhibition by FUra or RTX/FUra.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%