2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2013.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solution to the inverse problem of estimating gap-junctional and inhibitory conductance in inferior olive neurons from spike trains by network model simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We further investigated the effect of the spike data length on the estimation accuracy. The parameters were estimated under different settings of the data length, which was varied from 50 s to 500 s. These data lengths were comparable to the recording time of the experimental data in our previous study [3]. Figure 5 indicates that increasing the spike data length enhanced the estimation accuracy for both g i and g c .…”
Section: Parameter Estimation For the Test Datamentioning
confidence: 58%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We further investigated the effect of the spike data length on the estimation accuracy. The parameters were estimated under different settings of the data length, which was varied from 50 s to 500 s. These data lengths were comparable to the recording time of the experimental data in our previous study [3]. Figure 5 indicates that increasing the spike data length enhanced the estimation accuracy for both g i and g c .…”
Section: Parameter Estimation For the Test Datamentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The aim of our previous study was to overcome this challenging problem on the basis of the idea that the parameters are estimated for small segments of spike data. The distribution of the estimated parameters for small segments captured the essential features of the experimental conditions very well (PIX to reduce g i and CBX to reduce g c ) [3]. However, the estimation accuracy had not yet been properly evaluated, because the true values for g i and g c were unknown for the experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations