2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.actao.2011.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solutions for functional response experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3) models, as the Arditi-Akçakaya model allows for partial ratio dependence (2) ( 3) where P is the predator density, and m relates the attack rate to predator density such that a value of 0 indicates pure prey dependence and a value of 1 indicates ratio dependence. Prey were not replaced as they were killed, and we account for depletion of prey over time by using the formulations of these models provided by Okuyama and Ruyle (2011). These formulations also allowed us to examine the fit of ratio-dependent models where θ = 1 (i.e., hyperbolic), θ = 2 (i.e., sigmoidal), or where θ was estimated from the data.…”
Section: R Eportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) models, as the Arditi-Akçakaya model allows for partial ratio dependence (2) ( 3) where P is the predator density, and m relates the attack rate to predator density such that a value of 0 indicates pure prey dependence and a value of 1 indicates ratio dependence. Prey were not replaced as they were killed, and we account for depletion of prey over time by using the formulations of these models provided by Okuyama and Ruyle (2011). These formulations also allowed us to examine the fit of ratio-dependent models where θ = 1 (i.e., hyperbolic), θ = 2 (i.e., sigmoidal), or where θ was estimated from the data.…”
Section: R Eportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, more functional response studies began to test the importance of the predator density (Kratina et al. ; Okuyama and Ruyle ; Okuyama ). Nevertheless, as discussed above, those data usually do not have the needed resolution because the standard protocol of these experiments is to count the number of prey consumed at the end of an experimental trial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many functional response studies have characterized how prey density influences the average predation success, we know little about how the variance in predation success changes with the prey density because data are not analyzed in such a way. Recently, more functional response studies began to test the importance of the predator density (Kratina et al 2009;Okuyama and Ruyle 2011;Okuyama 2012). Nevertheless, as discussed above, those data usually do not have the needed resolution because the standard protocol of these experiments is to count the number of prey consumed at the end of an experimental trial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where a and h are the attack rate and the handling time, respectively, of the predator. Although the Lambert W function is used for convenience (Bolker, 2008;Okuyama & Ruyle, 2011), the same solution can be obtained using the random predator equation (Rogers, 1972).…”
Section: The Population Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predominant experimental approach is to place one predator and a variable number of prey (because prey density is the main factor that influences the functional response) in the same environment and count the number of prey eaten. Then, various functional response models are fit to the data (Okuyama & Ruyle, ). When the functional response f is independent of the predator density P (e.g., Holling, ), studies typically do not consider testing the assumption that fP describes the predation rate when there is more than one predator ( P > 1), after characterizing f when P = 1 (i.e., one predator in an experimental arena).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%