1990
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.41.4858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solvable model of the quantum spin glass in a transverse field

Abstract: The spin-glass model with p-spin interactions in the presence of a transverse field is solved in the limit p oo. The phase diagram is obtained and consists of three phases: a spin-glass phase and two paramagnetic phases. The paramagnetic phases are distinguished by transverse ordering.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

8
164
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
8
164
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, short-range models have O(1) local fields, and in fact, so do power-law and infinite-range systems with general p-body interactions. This suggests that the eigenstate-localized phase of the QREM is an exceptional case among long-range models: strict configuration-space localization cannot exist in any model with O(1) local fields, since the introduction of quantum dynamics causes resonant fluctuations.In this paper, we study the eigenstate properties of the quantum p-spin models [25][26][27][28]. Over the past four decades, these models have become paradigms for the mean-field theory of spin glasses [29][30][31][32] Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model (p = 2) [33,34].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, short-range models have O(1) local fields, and in fact, so do power-law and infinite-range systems with general p-body interactions. This suggests that the eigenstate-localized phase of the QREM is an exceptional case among long-range models: strict configuration-space localization cannot exist in any model with O(1) local fields, since the introduction of quantum dynamics causes resonant fluctuations.In this paper, we study the eigenstate properties of the quantum p-spin models [25][26][27][28]. Over the past four decades, these models have become paradigms for the mean-field theory of spin glasses [29][30][31][32] Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model (p = 2) [33,34].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…s c ( ) is the entropy density within c (which is strictly less than s eq ( )), and g c is a smooth, cluster-dependent O(1) function. More physically, such non-ergodic eigenstates are thermal within a cluster but not thermal in configuration space as a whole.Concretely, the quantum p-spin models are defined by [25] that the thermodynamic free energy of H p approaches that of the QREM as p increases. The eigenstate phases of H p do as well, yet the eigenstates are never localized at any finite p. They are instead non-ergodic, in a manner that comes to resemble localization as p increases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although this change survives even if we take the higher-order correlations into account as we show in the following, it is not clear whether it corresponds to the phase-transition point or not. For example, in the random energy model 16 the corresponding phase transition is of first order and it is not possible to determine the transition point from perturbative calculation (see Sec. III C for detailed calculations).…”
Section: B Self-consistent Equation In Linear Ordermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At p → ∞ this model is known as the random energy model and exhibits first-order phase transition between the CP and the QP phases. 16 The imaginary-time-correlation function at the QP phase can be calculated from the self-consistent equation in terms of χ(τ ),…”
Section: Classical and Quantum Paramagnetic Phasementioning
confidence: 99%