2017
DOI: 10.1007/s13385-017-0160-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solvency II solvency capital requirement for life insurance companies based on expected shortfall

Abstract: This paper examines the consequences for a life annuity insurance company if the solvency II solvency capital requirements (SCR) are calibrated based on expected shortfall (ES) instead of value-at-risk (VaR). We focus on the risk modules of the SCRs for the three risk classes equity risk, interest rate risk and longevity risk. The stress scenarios are determined using the calibration method proposed by EIOPA in 2014. We apply the stress-scenarios for these three risk classes to a fictitious life annuity insura… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 2007 and Liebwein 2006 ). The three-pillar structure follows a twofold objective: on the one hand, policy holders shall be protected as insurers are required to hold sufficient economic capital, and on the other hand, financial stability is increased (see, amongst others, Boonen 2017 and Gatzert and Wesker 2012 ). Besides its complexity (see, for instance, Monkiewicz 2013 and Meier, Rodriguez Gonzalez and Kunze, 2020 ), the Solvency II Directive and its risk-based approach is regarded as highly sophisticated and viewed as a significant improvement to previous regulatory frameworks governing the EU’s insurance industry (see, for example, Rae et al.…”
Section: Some Regulatory Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2007 and Liebwein 2006 ). The three-pillar structure follows a twofold objective: on the one hand, policy holders shall be protected as insurers are required to hold sufficient economic capital, and on the other hand, financial stability is increased (see, amongst others, Boonen 2017 and Gatzert and Wesker 2012 ). Besides its complexity (see, for instance, Monkiewicz 2013 and Meier, Rodriguez Gonzalez and Kunze, 2020 ), the Solvency II Directive and its risk-based approach is regarded as highly sophisticated and viewed as a significant improvement to previous regulatory frameworks governing the EU’s insurance industry (see, for example, Rae et al.…”
Section: Some Regulatory Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative approach calculated the SCR under Solvency II as a function of sub risk categories, namely equity risk and market risk [22].…”
Section: Solvency Capital Requirement (Scr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As highlighted by Rockafellar and Uryasev (2002), one of the main advantages of ES in relation to VaR is the fact that the ES presents the additional property of sub-additivity that classifies it as a coherent risk measure. Further details on ES can be found, for example, in the studies of Kellner and Rösch (2016), Boonen (2017), Degiannakis and Potamia (2017) and Müller and Righi (2018).…”
Section: Empirical Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%