1981
DOI: 10.1021/ja00396a016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solvent dependence of the stability of cryptate complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A more quantitative analysis of the data requires detailed consideration of the various equilibria that are involved in these systems (15,16). This in turn reveals certain fundamental relationships which tend to be obscured when viewing only percentages of extraction, as a result of the interplay of several constituent factors which contribute to this overall result.…”
Section: Analysis Of Equilibriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more quantitative analysis of the data requires detailed consideration of the various equilibria that are involved in these systems (15,16). This in turn reveals certain fundamental relationships which tend to be obscured when viewing only percentages of extraction, as a result of the interplay of several constituent factors which contribute to this overall result.…”
Section: Analysis Of Equilibriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results and Discussion (Table 1). [35] The experimental free energies of binding were determined from 1:1 binding constants from potentiometric titration experiments in previous work by Cox and co-workers. [35] Experimental enthalpies of binding were determined previously with microcalorimetry by Abraham and coworkers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[35] The experimental free energies of binding were determined from 1:1 binding constants from potentiometric titration experiments in previous work by Cox and co-workers. [35] Experimental enthalpies of binding were determined previously with microcalorimetry by Abraham and coworkers. [36] This trend reversal is profound because it highlights the binding multiequilibria; the binding constant is in fact a composite, information-rich term that should not be confined to a simplified two-body, host-guest interpretation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probably, this can be explained by the fact that the surface of this complex is more hydrophobic as compared with all cryptates under study. As was shown in [5], this is associated with the optimal arrangement of donor atoms with respect to included cation so that the interaction of the complex with its environment is largely determined by -CH 2 -groups. Correspondingly, the effect of squeezing out from the solution volume to the interface should manifest itself to the greatest extent for…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…As was already mentioned in previous publications, the general picture of adsorption phenomena in systems listed above is virtually totally determined by the adsorption of cryptate cations. This conclusion is defined by the high stability of complex species ( [the constant of complex formation] is equal to 3.98, 5.47, and 4.24 for [Na + ⊂ 222], [ K + ⊂ 222 ], and [Rb + ⊂ 222 ], respectively) [5,6], so that the free ligand concentration in the solutions studied does not exceed 10 -7 -10 -8 M.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%