2011
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201101746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solvent Effect on Palladium‐Catalyzed Cross‐Coupling Reactions and Implications on the Active Catalytic Species

Abstract: Suzuki coupling of the bifunctional substrate 1 using [Pd(2)(dba)(3)]/PtBu(3) gives selectivity for C-Cl in nonpolar solvents but for C-OTf in polar solvents. The results of computational and experimental studies suggest that the catalytically active species in polar solvents under conditions employing coordinating additives is inconsistent with monoligated [Pd(PtBu(3))]. Instead, the data are consistent with an anionic palladium complex as the active species.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
171
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
8
171
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…16 We discovered that employing the identical conditions in polar solvents, such as MeCN, gives rise to a complete selectivity reversal with exclusive transformation of the C−OTf bond. 15 We also demonstrated this selectivity reversal for intermolecular competition experiments and established that it is general in arylboronic acid. 15 Through detailed computational studies, we were able to show that neither electrostatic stabilization nor coordination by the polar solvent accounts for the selectivity reversal (see Figure 3).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…16 We discovered that employing the identical conditions in polar solvents, such as MeCN, gives rise to a complete selectivity reversal with exclusive transformation of the C−OTf bond. 15 We also demonstrated this selectivity reversal for intermolecular competition experiments and established that it is general in arylboronic acid. 15 Through detailed computational studies, we were able to show that neither electrostatic stabilization nor coordination by the polar solvent accounts for the selectivity reversal (see Figure 3).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…15 We also demonstrated this selectivity reversal for intermolecular competition experiments and established that it is general in arylboronic acid. 15 Through detailed computational studies, we were able to show that neither electrostatic stabilization nor coordination by the polar solvent accounts for the selectivity reversal (see Figure 3). Instead, a different active species is likely the cause of selectivity reversal in polar solvent: the reactivity of Pd 2 (dba) 3 /PtBu 3 in polar solvents was found to be consistent with anionic [Pd(0)PtBu 3 X]¯as active catalytic species if coordinating additives or cross-coupling partners are present in the mixture, leading to preferential C−OTf addition.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This is why ligands presenting both a phosphorus and an M a n u s c r i p t [75]. One year later they highlighted the role of the solvent on the selectivity of this reaction, observing that polar solvents stabilized monoligated PdL intermediates, and so oxidative addition across the C-Cl bond [76].…”
Section: Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The reacting medium may affect the oxidative addition or the transmetalation step 17 or even change the active catalytic species. 18 In the case of the model reaction, formation of compound 3a was favored in polar solvents, such as water, ethanol and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), when compared with less polar solvents such as tetrahydrofuran (THF) and toluene. In spite of the poor solubility of the coupling reagents in water, this solvent proved the best medium for the reaction, regardless of the employed heating source.…”
Section: Letter Syn Openmentioning
confidence: 99%