1992
DOI: 10.1002/polb.1992.090300304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solvent‐induced crystallinity in poly(aryl‐ether‐ether‐ketone) [PEEK]

Abstract: The amount and structure of the crystals formed by the solvent‐induced crystallization (SIC) following a sorption‐desorption cycle of five fluids (benzene, toluene, chloroform, methylene chloride, and carbon disulfide) in amorphous PEEK was determined by wideangle x‐ray scattering (WAXS). The SIC crystal structure was compared with that produced by thermal methods, both those formed at low temperature by heating the amorphous material 10–20°C above Tg or by cooling from the melt. Although smaller in size, the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because it has been reported that solvent-induced recrystallization of the amorphous PEEK solid proceeded at approximately 50 C because of the lowering of the glass transition temperature (T g ), the amorphous phase in the PEEK substrate recrystallized during thermal gra polymerization of DVB. [54][55][56] The DOCs of the graed-PEEK and PEEK-PEM (22% and 18%) were lower than that of PEEK-DVB because of the introduction of amorphous poly(ETSS) and PSSA gras. However, considering only a PEEK substrate area (in particular, subtracting the gra-polymer phases from the PEMs), the DOC 0 s of these lms (namely, subtracting the gra-polymer phases from the PEMs) were 36% and 31%.…”
Section: Morphological Changes Of Peek Substrates By Preparation Proc...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because it has been reported that solvent-induced recrystallization of the amorphous PEEK solid proceeded at approximately 50 C because of the lowering of the glass transition temperature (T g ), the amorphous phase in the PEEK substrate recrystallized during thermal gra polymerization of DVB. [54][55][56] The DOCs of the graed-PEEK and PEEK-PEM (22% and 18%) were lower than that of PEEK-DVB because of the introduction of amorphous poly(ETSS) and PSSA gras. However, considering only a PEEK substrate area (in particular, subtracting the gra-polymer phases from the PEMs), the DOC 0 s of these lms (namely, subtracting the gra-polymer phases from the PEMs) were 36% and 31%.…”
Section: Morphological Changes Of Peek Substrates By Preparation Proc...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The T g depression and crystallization induced by the dissolved, low molecular weight species are related to their solubility in and interactions with the polymers. Although liquid‐ and vapor‐induced crystallizations of polymers such as poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK),1, 2 polycarbonate (PC),3, 4 and poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)5, 6 have been extensively studied, there have been only limited investigations on compressed‐gas‐induced crystallization. CO 2 ‐induced crystallization in poly(vinylidene fluoride),7 PET,8, 9 PC,10 poly(phenylene sulfide) (PPS),11 PEEK,12 methyl‐substituted poly(ether ether ketone) (MePEEK),13 and syndiotactic polystyrene (sPS)14 has been reported recently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%