2018
DOI: 10.1080/02678292.2018.1425492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solvent-induced self-assembly of uniform lying helix alignment of the cholesteric liquid crystal phase for the flexoelectro-optic effect

Abstract: A uniform lying helix (ULH) alignment of cholesteric liquid crystals (CLCs) is obtained using a solvent evaporation technique. The solvent evaporation method allows for the spontaneous formation of a virtually defect-free alignment, even in the absence of an external electric field. The small amount of solvent diffuses into the LC and changes its phase into the isotropic state where the individual LC molecules are more mobile. As the solvent diffuses out of the LC and consequently evaporates, additional mobili… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relatively low efficiency is due to scattering from non‐uniformities in the lying helix alignment of the LC phase modulation layer, but it is anticipated that the maximum efficiency could be significantly improved through the use of high‐quality ULH alignments such as those formed using solvent‐assisted processes. [ 30 ] Additionally, we can consider the Figure‐of‐Merit (FoM) for the modulator, as introduced by Khoo and Wu. [ 31 ] For nematic‐based devices this parameter can be defined as FoM =K11Δn2γ1 where K 11 is the LC splay elastic constant, Δ n is the optical anisotropy, and γ 1 is the rotational viscosity.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relatively low efficiency is due to scattering from non‐uniformities in the lying helix alignment of the LC phase modulation layer, but it is anticipated that the maximum efficiency could be significantly improved through the use of high‐quality ULH alignments such as those formed using solvent‐assisted processes. [ 30 ] Additionally, we can consider the Figure‐of‐Merit (FoM) for the modulator, as introduced by Khoo and Wu. [ 31 ] For nematic‐based devices this parameter can be defined as FoM =K11Δn2γ1 where K 11 is the LC splay elastic constant, Δ n is the optical anisotropy, and γ 1 is the rotational viscosity.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of efficiency, it was found that this varied between 16% and 44%, depending upon the alignment quality. The relatively low efficiency is due to scattering from non-uniformities in the lying helix alignment of the LC phase modulation layer and it is expected that the maximum efficiency could be significantly improved through the use of high quality ULH alignments such as those formed using solvent-assisted processes 31 . It is also worth stating that for a practical device with a silicon backplane, any unmodulated light would be reflected by the silicon backplane, pass through the LC components and would then be blocked by the polariser at the front of the device.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 It has also been shown that a very high quality, near mono-domain alignment can be achieved using a solvent evaporation process, although it may be difficult to extend this technique to large areas. 22 Given the complexity of obtaining a high-quality ULH alignment, together with the limitations imposed by the simple measurement methods outlined above, it can be difficult, or at the very least inconvenient, to establish the flexoelectric coefficient combination, e 1 -e 3 . Ideally, a method is needed that works robustly with simple alignments (homeotropic and/or planar) and gives accurate results independent of the precise "quality" of the surface alignment used.…”
Section: Journal Of Applied Physicsmentioning
confidence: 99%