2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.11.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solvent molecule mobilities in propylene carbonate-based electrolyte solutions coexisting with fumed oxide nanoparticles

Abstract: Non-aqueous LiClO4 solutions kneaded with various fumed oxides (fumed silica, fumed alumina, and fumed titania) were employed as model systems of lithium ion batteries. The properties of the solid phase and Li + ions, which affect solvent molecules, were evaluated using 1 H NMR spectroscopy and 1 H NMR relaxation time (T1, T2) measurements. The 1 H NMR signals of propylene carbonate (PC) molecules were influenced by the coexisting solid phase in the LiClO4-PC solution/fumed oxide nanoparticle dispersion. The m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous study has reported that the liquid phase near the solid phase is influenced by the solid surface in the solid-liquid mixture. [5][6][7][8] In this study, we measured the electrical conductivity of a sample mixed with LiCoO 2 powder and LiClO 4 solution using propylene carbonate (PC) and 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME) as solvents (LiClO 4 -PC 1¹x DME x ). Although a system including EC as conventional solvent might be focused, they indicate the simple decreasing of conductivity by adding low viscose solvent, therefore each effect of solvent for conductivity is not distinguish clearly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study has reported that the liquid phase near the solid phase is influenced by the solid surface in the solid-liquid mixture. [5][6][7][8] In this study, we measured the electrical conductivity of a sample mixed with LiCoO 2 powder and LiClO 4 solution using propylene carbonate (PC) and 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME) as solvents (LiClO 4 -PC 1¹x DME x ). Although a system including EC as conventional solvent might be focused, they indicate the simple decreasing of conductivity by adding low viscose solvent, therefore each effect of solvent for conductivity is not distinguish clearly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 However, since the resolution of the signal intensity is not very clear when using 14 N qNMR, 1 H qNMR is presently becoming a more popular quantitative technique. [4][5][6][7][8] In qNMR, solutes are generally the analysis targets; using solvents as analysis targets for 1 H qNMR is rare, 9 and only trace amounts of residual solvent in solution can be thus quantified. 10,11 Therefore, the cause of this "anomaly of decreasing 1 H NMR signal intensity" is mostly unknown, although one likely explanation is that the motility of water molecules in the primary hydration shell of metal ions is significantly reduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gain of the RF amplifier in the NMR spectrometer (i.e., receiver gain) was set to a constant of -10 dB. To avoid inaccuracies in the integrated intensities of the 1 H NMR signals, all 1 H NMR spectral data after the Fourier transform were carefully corrected for the phase and baseline5,6,9,13 using the NMR analysis software Mnova ver.14.2 (Mestrelab…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, chemical species that exist inside or near polymer compounds, such as solid-liquid interfaces and proteins, and molecules which strongly solvated to central ions, are often not detected by general solution NMR because their motility is extremely limited. 11,12 Therefore, attempts have started to directly convert the NMR signal intensity into a concentration using a theoretical analysis of the nuclear spin state, or to determine the concentration of an observed chemical species by a calibration curve method using a standard substance. 13 In a broad sense, the current situation is that these attempts are quantitative NMR (qNMR) methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%