2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00723-013-0482-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solvent Suppression in High-Resolution 1H NMR Spectroscopy Using Conventional and Phase Alternated Continuous Wave Free Precession

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The experiments used a CWFP train with a few hundred pulses, producing a null signal for the solvent line on resonance before the acquisition. The method has been used in one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) high-resolution NMR experiments [36].…”
Section: Fast and Simultaneous T1 And T2 Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiments used a CWFP train with a few hundred pulses, producing a null signal for the solvent line on resonance before the acquisition. The method has been used in one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) high-resolution NMR experiments [36].…”
Section: Fast and Simultaneous T1 And T2 Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in the SSFP regime, each pulse produces FID and echo signals that are 180 out of phase. SSFP sequences have been widely used in fast magnetic resonance imaging protocols as well as to enhance the signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio in high-resolution NMR spectroscopy [15][16][17][18][19]. Figure 1c shows the SSFP signal observed in a very fast pulse rate in which T p < T 2 * .…”
Section: Steady-state Free Precession Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liquid state NMR of proteins strongly relies on the observation of the amide NH proton resonances and is therefore carried out in a solvent mainly composed of light water. The concentration of hydrogen in protein NMR samples (110 mol L −1 ) compared to the one of the protein itself (1 mmol L −1 or less, (Zheng and Price, 2010)) forced NMR spectroscopists to create efficient water signal suppression techniques (Lee et al, 2017;Chen et al, 2017;Duarte et al, 2013;Gouilleux et al, 2017). Without them, the water signal would cover a wide band of signals of high structural importance and would also hamper the accurate operation of analog to digital signal conversion devices (Mo and Raftery, 2008) resulting in detection sensitivity reduction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%