2013
DOI: 10.5089/9781475589214.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving and Estimating Indeterminate DSGE Models

Abstract: 1 We thank seminar participants at UCLA and at the Dynare workshop in Paris in July of 2010, where Farmer presented a preliminary draft of the solution technique discussed in this paper. That technique was further developed in Chapter 1 of Khramov's Ph.D. thesis (Khramov, 2013). We would like to thank Thomas Lubik and three referees of this journal who provided comments that have considerably improved the final version. AbstractWe propose a method for solving and estimating linear rational expectations models … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
68
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An updated solution method for rational expectations models that allows either J1 or J2 or both to be singular can be found in Sims (2001). Solution methods for models with indeterminacy are provided in Farmer et al (2015).…”
Section: A Three-generation Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An updated solution method for rational expectations models that allows either J1 or J2 or both to be singular can be found in Sims (2001). Solution methods for models with indeterminacy are provided in Farmer et al (2015).…”
Section: A Three-generation Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the model specified by equations (7)-(10) is modified to accommodate for 'sunspot' shocks. Farmer and Khramov (2013) specify two alternative ways to redefine non-fundamental shocks as new fundamentals in a simple three equation New Keynesian model. One approach is to define the forecast error on output gap η 1,t = y t − E t−1 [y t ] as a fundamental shock, whereas the other approach is to define the forecast error on inflation η 2,t = π t − E t−1 [π t ] as a fundamental shock.…”
Section: Simulating the Model For The Pre-volcker Eramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By this we mean that the borrower's budget and credit constraints are now: (19) while the lender's budget constraint is: (20) so that the interest repayment due in period t is now predetermined while the interest rate that enters the credit constraint is variable but now known in period t. It is then easy, using again the lender's first-order condition (10), to show that the interest rate is constant over time, that is, R t =β −1 , so that X t = 1 at all dates and the economy is forever in steady state absent fundamental shocks.…”
Section: Proposition 1 (An Analytical Example Of Global Self-fulfillimentioning
confidence: 99%