Solving bi-objective economic-emission load dispatch of diesel-wind-solar microgrid using African vulture optimization algorithm

Mishra, Shilpa; Shaik, Abdul Gafoor

doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24993

Cited by 7 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 55 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Due to its exceptional qualities, the AVOA algorithm has been applied in numerous fields. It is fast to converge, extremely adaptive, and capable of avoiding local optimum situations 12 , 13 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A novel optimization rainfall coupling model based on stepwise decomposition technique

Zheng,

Zhang,

Yin

et al. 2024

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Traditional decomposition integration models decompose the original sequence into subsequences, which are then proportionally divided into training and testing periods for modeling. Decomposition may cause data aliasing, then the decomposed training period may contain part of the test period data. A more effective method of sample construction is sought in order to accurately validate the model prediction accuracy. Semi-stepwise decomposition (SSD), full stepwise decomposition (FSD), single model semi-stepwise decomposition (SMSSD), and single model full stepwise decomposition (SMFSD) techniques were used to create the samples. This study integrates Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD), African Vulture Optimization Algorithm (AVOA), and Least Squares Support Vector Machine (LSSVM) to construct a coupled rainfall prediction model. The influence of different VMD parameters α is examined, and the most suitable stepwise decomposition machine learning coupled model algorithm for various stations in the North China Plain is selected. The results reveal that SMFSD is relatively the most suitable tool for monthly precipitation forecasting in the North China Plain. Among the predictions for the five stations, the best overall performance is observed at Huairou Station (RMSE of 18.37 mm, NSE of 0.86, MRE of 107.2%) and Jingxian Station (RMSE of 24.74 mm, NSE of 0.86, MRE of 51.71%), while Hekou Station exhibits the poorest performance (RMSE of 25.11 mm, NSE of 0.75, MRE of 173.75%).

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%