2021
DOI: 10.21608/sej.2021.155880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving Combined Economic and Emission Dispatch Problem Using the Slime Mould Algorithm

Abstract: In this paper, a novel optimization method called Slime Mould Algorithm (SMA) for solving the ELD and CEED problem is presented. To investigate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm, the 10 and 40 units considering the valve point loading effect test has been executed. The solving the Economic Load Dispatch (ELD) and Combined Economic and Emission Dispatch (CEED) are crucial task in modern power systems. The aim of ELD is assigning the best generation scheduling for minimum cost generation with satisfyin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the best compromise solution determined by SGO and MSGO. Comparison of solutions from the Pareto front of MSGO with BCSs obtained using other algorithms: In the case of C1c, in order to test the ability of MSGO to identify solutions from the Pareto front, it was compared with BCSs obtained using a group of algorithms (denoted G1) presented in the literature G1 = {EMOCA [24], MODE [42], NSGA II [42], TLBO [26], GSA [70], PDE [42], SMA [71], εv-MOGA [49], SPES-2 [42]}. To highlight the Pareto front solutions obtained using MSGO and BCSs obtained using competing algorithms in the G1 group, in Figure 6, a detail of the Cost-Emission plan is shown.…”
Section: Results For Eed Problem (Cases C 1c -C 4c )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the best compromise solution determined by SGO and MSGO. Comparison of solutions from the Pareto front of MSGO with BCSs obtained using other algorithms: In the case of C1c, in order to test the ability of MSGO to identify solutions from the Pareto front, it was compared with BCSs obtained using a group of algorithms (denoted G1) presented in the literature G1 = {EMOCA [24], MODE [42], NSGA II [42], TLBO [26], GSA [70], PDE [42], SMA [71], εv-MOGA [49], SPES-2 [42]}. To highlight the Pareto front solutions obtained using MSGO and BCSs obtained using competing algorithms in the G1 group, in Figure 6, a detail of the Cost-Emission plan is shown.…”
Section: Results For Eed Problem (Cases C 1c -C 4c )mentioning
confidence: 99%