2009 Third Asia International Conference on Modelling &Amp; Simulation 2009
DOI: 10.1109/ams.2009.38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving Constrained Multi-objective Optimization Problems Using Non-dominated Ranked Genetic Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jadaan and Rao [35] combined a new non-dominated ranked genetic algorithm (NRGA) with a non-parameter penalty method to continuously search for the better Pareto optimal set. Zhang et al [36] designed a multi-hive colony artificial bee colony method to deal with CMOPs, by employing a general coevolution model.…”
Section: A Methods Based On Penalty Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jadaan and Rao [35] combined a new non-dominated ranked genetic algorithm (NRGA) with a non-parameter penalty method to continuously search for the better Pareto optimal set. Zhang et al [36] designed a multi-hive colony artificial bee colony method to deal with CMOPs, by employing a general coevolution model.…”
Section: A Methods Based On Penalty Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection process selects chromosomes from the mating pool directed by the survival of the fittest concept of natural genetic systems [22], [23]. In the proportional selection method (Rank Roulette Wheel selection (RRWS) [24]) is adopted in this paper, a string is assigned a number of copies, which is proportional to its fitness in the population, that send into the mating pool for further genetic operations.…”
Section: ) Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our experiments, we use as reference set the obtained points from our 1-MOEA approach. This first quantification is evaluated through equation (18) (Tan et al, 2001;Deb and Jain, 2002;Al Jadaan et al, 2009;Chang et al, 2005) which gives the measure of the minimum Euclidean distance to the set P * . …”
Section: Multi-objective Genetic Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this metrics as the value of ESS is lower, the approximation is better (Tan et al, 2001;Deb and Jain, 2002;Al Jadaan et al, 2009;Chang et al, 2005), and it is defined as: where d i is the minimum distance between two solutions in the population P(t), j ¼ 1, 2, 3, . .…”
Section: Multi-objective Genetic Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation