2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnum.2022.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving fractal-fractional differential equations using operational matrix of derivatives via Hilfer fractal-fractional derivative sense

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays, the subject of fractional calculus on time scales is very rich and under strong current research [18, 25–30]. Here, we make use of the idea behind a ψ$$ \psi $$‐Hilfer fractional derivative, that is, fractional differentiation of functions with respect to another function, which is a remarkable and relevant idea with a big impact on fractional calculus and its applications, in particular for problems described by fractional differential equations [31]. The study of ψ$$ \psi $$‐Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals with respect to a function ψ$$ \psi $$ on time scales was initiated by Mekhalfi and Torres in 2017, where they introduced some generalized fractional operators on time scales of a function with respect to another function and carried out some applications to dynamic equations [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, the subject of fractional calculus on time scales is very rich and under strong current research [18, 25–30]. Here, we make use of the idea behind a ψ$$ \psi $$‐Hilfer fractional derivative, that is, fractional differentiation of functions with respect to another function, which is a remarkable and relevant idea with a big impact on fractional calculus and its applications, in particular for problems described by fractional differential equations [31]. The study of ψ$$ \psi $$‐Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals with respect to a function ψ$$ \psi $$ on time scales was initiated by Mekhalfi and Torres in 2017, where they introduced some generalized fractional operators on time scales of a function with respect to another function and carried out some applications to dynamic equations [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the majority of FDEs are complicated to solve analytically, numerical solutions are in high demand. A variety of numerical approaches are present in the literature for solving ordinary and partial FDEs numerically, but the OM approach coupled with the Tau method and the collocation method is commonly utilized [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. This method works by converting the FDEs into an algebraic equation system that can be solved with any computer programmer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we have to perform substantial numerical calculations to solve them. A variety of well-known algorithms can solve FDEs, such as operational matrix, [22][23][24][25][26] Adomian decomposition, 27 Harr wavelet Method, 28 Homotopy perturbation, 29 variational iteration, 30 neural networks (NNs), [31][32][33] and finite difference. 34,35 In comparison to classic numerical approaches, the approximate calculation of ANN appears to be less sensitive to the spatial dimension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we have to perform substantial numerical calculations to solve them. A variety of well‐known algorithms can solve FDEs, such as operational matrix, 22‐26 Adomian decomposition, 27 Harr wavelet Method, 28 Homotopy perturbation, 29 variational iteration, 30 neural networks (NNs), 31‐33 and finite difference 34,35 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%