2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving graphics tasks: Gender differences in middle-school students

Abstract: The capacity to solve tasks that contain high concentrations of visualespatial information, including graphs, maps and diagrams, is becoming increasingly important in educational contexts as well as everyday life. This research examined gender differences in the performance of students solving graphics tasks from the Graphical Languages in Mathematics (GLIM) instrument that included number lines, graphs, maps and diagrams. The participants were 317 Australian students (169 males and 148 females) aged 9e12 year… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lowrie and Diezmann (2011) found that males outperform females on graphical problem solving tasks. This suggests that regardless of female participants' problem solving skills, the notion of women as less effective problem solvers, as promoted by researchers such as Lowrie and Diezmann (2011), may lead to greater stress for women socialized to believe they are less proficient in the task at hand, thus driving negative affect. In contrast, the males who had an easier time coming to a solution, or at least expected to, may have experienced less frustration and more enjoyment, given perceived male competence in such problem solving.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lowrie and Diezmann (2011) found that males outperform females on graphical problem solving tasks. This suggests that regardless of female participants' problem solving skills, the notion of women as less effective problem solvers, as promoted by researchers such as Lowrie and Diezmann (2011), may lead to greater stress for women socialized to believe they are less proficient in the task at hand, thus driving negative affect. In contrast, the males who had an easier time coming to a solution, or at least expected to, may have experienced less frustration and more enjoyment, given perceived male competence in such problem solving.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of male students are better than female students in solving problems a graph at the age of 9-12 years in Australia [17]. There was no significant difference in the ability of students mathematics in terms of gender in the field of geometry [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, Liu (2010) found out that male students demonstrated significantly stronger analysis, reflection abilities, and overall performance than female students. Lowrie and Diezmann (2011) focused on studying the performances of students of different genders in graphical problem-solving tasks (refers to the problems related to the tools of Graphical Languages in Mathematics, including number lines, graphs, maps, and diagrams). They found that boys had better performance in graphical tasks than did girls; in particular, when facing graphical tasks of two and three-dimensional representations, boys demonstrated better skills in interpretation of information than did girls.…”
Section: Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies that found a significant difference between students of different genders all used domain-specific critical thinking tests, such as the graphical task used by Lowrie and Diezmann (2011), which is different from traditional critical thinking tests. For this reason, because this study used the mechanical critical thinking scale as an evaluation tool, the performances of different genders tested by this tool were expected to be significantly different.…”
Section: Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%