2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10543-022-00930-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving large linear least squares problems with linear equality constraints

Abstract: We consider the problem of solving large-scale linear least squares problems that have one or more linear constraints that must be satisfied exactly. While some classical approaches are theoretically well founded, they can face difficulties when the matrix of constraints contains dense rows or if an algorithmic transformation used in the solution process results in a modified problem that is much denser than the original one. We propose modifications with an emphasis on requiring that the constraints be satisf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The constraint problem leads to a linear system of equations that is solved prior to the main discrete problem. The matrix in the constraints problem is rectangular and singular, which admits a nonunique solution, and the null-space method 42,43 is applied to obtain the complete solution. It should be noted here that in Oden at al., 44 a penalty-free DG method is proposed, but this method has not been widely adopted due to its low level of accuracy when compared to penalty-based approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constraint problem leads to a linear system of equations that is solved prior to the main discrete problem. The matrix in the constraints problem is rectangular and singular, which admits a nonunique solution, and the null-space method 42,43 is applied to obtain the complete solution. It should be noted here that in Oden at al., 44 a penalty-free DG method is proposed, but this method has not been widely adopted due to its low level of accuracy when compared to penalty-based approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%