2022
DOI: 10.3390/math10142395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving Rescheduling Problems in Dynamic Permutation Flow Shop Environments with Multiple Objectives Using the Hybrid Dynamic Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic II Algorithm

Abstract: In this work, we seek to design a model that contributes to the study and resolution of a multi-objective rescheduling problem in dynamic permutation flow shop contexts. In this type of problem, where the objectives can be valued in heterogeneous units, the difficulty of achieving an optimal solution leads to finding a set of non-dominated efficient solutions (also called Pareto front). On the other hand, we will also consider the potential appearance of disruptions in planned scheduling (such as machine break… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 69 publications
(81 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For measuring the performance of the schedule, many efficiency criteria are often considered in rescheduling problem. such as the Makespan [11,12,13], tardiness [14,15], total flow time [16], and maximum lateness [17]. However, other authors have studied weighted criteria like the total weighted completion times [18,19], the total weighted tardiness [20], or the total weighted waiting time [21,22,23].…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For measuring the performance of the schedule, many efficiency criteria are often considered in rescheduling problem. such as the Makespan [11,12,13], tardiness [14,15], total flow time [16], and maximum lateness [17]. However, other authors have studied weighted criteria like the total weighted completion times [18,19], the total weighted tardiness [20], or the total weighted waiting time [21,22,23].…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%