2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-10997-4_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving the False Positives Problem in Fraud Prediction Using Automated Feature Engineering

Abstract: In this paper, we present an automated feature engineering based approach to dramatically reduce false positives in fraud prediction. False positives plague the fraud prediction industry. It is estimated that only 1 in 5 declared as fraud are actually fraud and roughly 1 in every 6 customers have had a valid transaction declined in the past year. To address this problem, we use the Deep Feature Synthesis algorithm to automatically derive behavioral features based on the historical data of the card associated w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wedge et al [ 67 ] proposed an approach for automated feature engineering designed to reduce the number of false positives. The authors stated that accessible information about cards and customers can increase the size of potential features set drastically.…”
Section: Fraud Detection In the Fintech Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wedge et al [ 67 ] proposed an approach for automated feature engineering designed to reduce the number of false positives. The authors stated that accessible information about cards and customers can increase the size of potential features set drastically.…”
Section: Fraud Detection In the Fintech Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the growing focus on illicit activities, the academic literature has emphasised coming up with a wide variety of automated detection systems to detect such illicit activities (Baader and Krcmar, 2018;Battaglia et al, 2018;Chang et al, 2008;Gepp, 2016;Gepp et al, 2018;Gepp, 2015;Khaled et al, 2018;Ngai et al, 2011;Perols, 2011;Phua et al, 2010;Ravenda et al, 2015;Sahin et al, 2013;Singh and Best, 2019;Song et al, 2014;Van Vlasselaer et al, 2017;Wedge et al, 2017). As per Ngai et al (2011), although the application of datamining techniques has been extended towards the detection of insurance fraud, there exists a distinct lack of research on mortgage fraud, money laundering and securities and commodities fraud.…”
Section: Detection Of Money Launderingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to reduce the number of false positives, [19] proposed a model based on automated feature engineering to automatically derive behavioral features based on the historical data of a credit card associated with a transaction. A total of 237 features for each transaction was generated, and a random forest was then employed to learn a classifier.…”
Section: Detecting Electronic Banking Fraud On Highly Imbalanced Data …mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the highly imbalanced nature of the dataset, precision(p), recall(R) and F1scores (F) as presented in equations (33) to (35) respectively are used as evaluation metrics (Wedge et al [19]). y=, Ÿ=, Ÿ8 represent True Positives, False Positives and False Negatives respectively.…”
Section: Fraud Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%