2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(00)00110-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving the generalized apportionment problem through the optimization of discrepancy functions

Abstract: One of the ways to solve the classical apportionment problem (which has been studied chiefly in relation to the apportionment of seats in a chamber of representatives) is the optimization of a discrepancy function; although this approach seems very natural, it has been hardly used. In this paper, we propose a more general formalization of the problem and an optimization procedure for a broad class of discrepancy functions, study the properties of the procedure and present some examples in which it is applied.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the various methods, we have considered divisor methods to link up with sum deviation JIT sequencing problem. The generalized apportionment problem is studied in [13] via the optimization of discrepancy functions, where a more general formalization of the problem and an optimization procedure are presented together with some properties and examples to optimize some specific functions. Moreover, this procedure can be regarded as a generalization of the divisor methods.…”
Section: Brief Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the various methods, we have considered divisor methods to link up with sum deviation JIT sequencing problem. The generalized apportionment problem is studied in [13] via the optimization of discrepancy functions, where a more general formalization of the problem and an optimization procedure are presented together with some properties and examples to optimize some specific functions. Moreover, this procedure can be regarded as a generalization of the divisor methods.…”
Section: Brief Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%