2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving the interval linear programming problem: A new algorithm for a general case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3) It can be followed that a IR 1 b and b IR 1 c, and also it is clear that a IR 1 c, which implies that IR 1 is transitive; the same is true for the other four relations. 4) Neither a IR 1 e nor e IR 1 a, holds, which means that a = [2,3] and e = [2.2, 2.4] cannot be compared by IR 1 , the same is true for the other four relations; as a result, all the five ordering relations are not totally ordering on I(R). Particularly, more solutions cannot be distinguished by relation IR 5 since its condition is very strong.…”
Section: Ordering Relations and Possibility Degrees Of Intervalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3) It can be followed that a IR 1 b and b IR 1 c, and also it is clear that a IR 1 c, which implies that IR 1 is transitive; the same is true for the other four relations. 4) Neither a IR 1 e nor e IR 1 a, holds, which means that a = [2,3] and e = [2.2, 2.4] cannot be compared by IR 1 , the same is true for the other four relations; as a result, all the five ordering relations are not totally ordering on I(R). Particularly, more solutions cannot be distinguished by relation IR 5 since its condition is very strong.…”
Section: Ordering Relations and Possibility Degrees Of Intervalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In numerical optimization, the approaches for solving them can be grouped into three categories: satisficing approaches, optimizing approaches and minimax regret approaches. The satisficing approaches transform an interval programming model into one or more deterministic model(s) by using ordering relations or possibility degrees between intervals, and then solutions of the original model are evaluated according to the values of the transformed deterministic objective function(s) [1,2,6,9,10,21,33]. The optimizing approaches put forward the concepts of weak or strong optimal solutions for interval linear programming [19,26,30,36] or extend the concept of efficiency used in conventional multi-objective programming to interval environment [5,17,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A survey on results can be found in [6]. Since that time, a partial characterization of the weakly optimal solution set was given in [2] and an inner approximation was considered in [1]. More general concepts of solutions, extending weak and strong solutions, were recently addressed in [10,12,13].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interval linear programming (ILP) is used to deal with uncertainties of many real-world problems, where parameters may be specified as lying between lower and upper bounds. There are several methods for solving ILP models, which are divided into two sub-models to obtain the solution set [2,3,4,10,12,14,24,26,27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%