2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2022.103665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving the inverse problem based on UPEMD for electrocardiographic imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sixth, regarding prediction reliability and uncertainty quantification, the current applications of ML in the spinal imaging field (nay, in the entire biomedical informatics field) generally seem to focus on the prediction task, and the model performance is evaluated with such metrics as accuracy, ROC, and sensitivity [ 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 ]. However, the much lower attended reliability and uncertainty of the predictions can be of great significance in medical diagnosis [ 131 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sixth, regarding prediction reliability and uncertainty quantification, the current applications of ML in the spinal imaging field (nay, in the entire biomedical informatics field) generally seem to focus on the prediction task, and the model performance is evaluated with such metrics as accuracy, ROC, and sensitivity [ 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 ]. However, the much lower attended reliability and uncertainty of the predictions can be of great significance in medical diagnosis [ 131 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the evaluation criteria of Swets [ 65 ], when the AUC = 0.5, the diagnosis is completely ineffective; when the AUC is less than 0.5, it is not in line with the actual situation; it is generally believed that 0.5 < AUC ≤ 0.7 indicates low diagnostic value. It is only for reference in practical applications; 0.7 < AUC ≤ 0.9 indicates a certain degree of accuracy and can be used in clinical diagnosis, with a medium diagnostic value; AUC > 0.9 indicates a relatively high diagnostic value, which can be used in clinical diagnosis as an important diagnostic basis [ 66 , 67 ]. In the results of this study, the AUC was 0.89, close to 0.9, so we think that saliva cortisol testing can be considered an auxiliary method for the clinical diagnosis of depression, and its diagnostic value is moderate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polyuria, polyphagia, polydipsia, abrupt weight loss, hazy eyesight, etc., are typical DM symptoms [ 62 , 63 ]. Recent research by Harris et al [ 64 ] indicates that DM may be present 7 or even 12 years prior to clinical diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%