2012
DOI: 10.1037/a0027934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving the measurement invariance anchor item problem in item response theory.

Abstract: The efficacy of tests of differential item functioning (measurement invariance) has been well established. It is clear that when properly implemented, these tests can successfully identify differentially functioning (DF) items when they exist. However, an assumption of these analyses is that the metric for different groups is linked using anchor items that are invariant. In practice, however, it is impossible to be certain which items are DF and which are invariant. This problem of anchor items, or referent in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
87
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
87
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Identify one appropriate anchor item for each measure to establish a scale for the latent variables by the method suggested by Meade and Wright (2012) Preliminary model-data fit analyses. Because the MWML-IFA model is a recent development, there is, at present, little guidance for evaluating absolute model-data fit.…”
Section: Analytic Model and Estimation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identify one appropriate anchor item for each measure to establish a scale for the latent variables by the method suggested by Meade and Wright (2012) Preliminary model-data fit analyses. Because the MWML-IFA model is a recent development, there is, at present, little guidance for evaluating absolute model-data fit.…”
Section: Analytic Model and Estimation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods were not feasible in this case given the large sample size as any such test would be drastically overpowered and, therefore, overly sensitive to potentially spurious group differences. To address this potential concern, effect sizes (see Meade, ) were used in lieu of significance tests following the method of Meade and Wright (). The use of such effect sizes necessitated defining criteria for what constitutes an acceptable difference because no criteria or recommendations currently exist in the DIF literature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do this, the anchor set of items used for equating should be free of IP. But IP cannot be excluded before the tests are equated (as any source of differential item functioning [19]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%