2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10851-017-0772-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving Uncalibrated Photometric Stereo Using Fewer Images by Jointly Optimizing Low-rank Matrix Completion and Integrability

Abstract: We introduce a new, integrated approach to uncalibrated photometric stereo. We perform 3D reconstruction of Lambertian objects using multiple images produced by unknown, directional light sources. We show how to formulate a single optimization that includes rank and integrability constraints, allowing also for missing data. We then solve this optimization using the Alternate Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM). We conduct extensive experimental evaluation on real and synthetic data sets. Our integrated appr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…with Ω ⊂ R 2 the mask of the object to reconstruct, I i : Ω → R the i-th input graylevel image, ρ the reflectance (albedo) map, n the normal map (which encodes the 3Dgeometry), and s i ∈ R 3 a vector representing the incident lighting in the i-th image (in intensity and direction). Most of recent works on photometric stereo have focused on relaxing the assumptions of Lambertian reflectance (i.e., handling surfaces which exhibit a specular behavior) [4,21,11,29] and calibrated directional lighting (i.e., handling unknown or non-uniform lighting) [5,10,13,22], see for instance [23] for some discussion and [3] for a state-ofthe-art joint solution to both issues using deep neural networks. However, in all of these recent works the object to reconstruct is assumed to be segmented a priori: the whole pipeline relies on the knowledge of the domain Ω.…”
Section: Variational Methods For Photometric Stereo and Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with Ω ⊂ R 2 the mask of the object to reconstruct, I i : Ω → R the i-th input graylevel image, ρ the reflectance (albedo) map, n the normal map (which encodes the 3Dgeometry), and s i ∈ R 3 a vector representing the incident lighting in the i-th image (in intensity and direction). Most of recent works on photometric stereo have focused on relaxing the assumptions of Lambertian reflectance (i.e., handling surfaces which exhibit a specular behavior) [4,21,11,29] and calibrated directional lighting (i.e., handling unknown or non-uniform lighting) [5,10,13,22], see for instance [23] for some discussion and [3] for a state-ofthe-art joint solution to both issues using deep neural networks. However, in all of these recent works the object to reconstruct is assumed to be segmented a priori: the whole pipeline relies on the knowledge of the domain Ω.…”
Section: Variational Methods For Photometric Stereo and Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Papadhimitri et al [52] presents a closed-form solution by detecting local diffuse reflectance maxima (LDR). Other methods assume perspective projection [51], specularities [21,18], low-rank [59], interreflections [9] or symmetry properties of BRDFs [64,73,44].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11,13]. Low-rank approximation was also considered for solving the uncalibrated case by jointly minimizing the rank and enforcing integrability [15]. Fig.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%