The Future of Soil Carbon 2018
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-811687-6.00005-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SOM and Microbes—What Is Left From Microbial Life

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 137 publications
0
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Microorganisms are at the heart of two critical, contrasting mechanisms: not only reducing SOC stocks through mineralization to CO 2 but also increasing SOC stocks through the formation of microbial biomass and stabilization of its residues associated with minerals, within soil structures, or by incrustation with, for example, Fe or Si precipitates (Kästner & Miltner, ; Lehmann, Kinyangi, & Solomon, ; Liang et al, ). By now, it is readily accepted that SOC storage is heavily influenced by anabolic activities of microorganisms, emphasizing that the most persistent organic carbon in soil may not be composed of plant litter or their residues but carbon that has first passed through microbial biomass (Benner, ; Cotrufo, Wallenstein, Boot, Denef, & Paul, ; Liang & Balser, ; Lützow et al, ; Miltner, Bombach, Schmidt‐Brücken, & Kästner, ; Figure ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Microorganisms are at the heart of two critical, contrasting mechanisms: not only reducing SOC stocks through mineralization to CO 2 but also increasing SOC stocks through the formation of microbial biomass and stabilization of its residues associated with minerals, within soil structures, or by incrustation with, for example, Fe or Si precipitates (Kästner & Miltner, ; Lehmann, Kinyangi, & Solomon, ; Liang et al, ). By now, it is readily accepted that SOC storage is heavily influenced by anabolic activities of microorganisms, emphasizing that the most persistent organic carbon in soil may not be composed of plant litter or their residues but carbon that has first passed through microbial biomass (Benner, ; Cotrufo, Wallenstein, Boot, Denef, & Paul, ; Liang & Balser, ; Lützow et al, ; Miltner, Bombach, Schmidt‐Brücken, & Kästner, ; Figure ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This consideration is based on the fact that easily degradable and accessible molecules in SOM will be consumed by microorganisms and that even sorbed molecules can be degraded (Miltner et al, ; Schmidt et al, ). The molecules will then be partly mineralized for gaining energy (catabolism) and partly used for building microbial biomass (anabolism; Kästner & Miltner, ; Liang et al, ). After cell death and subsequent lysis and fragmentation, several organic cell compounds are still present and contribute, thus, to the pool of microbial necromass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different microbial groups have diverse necromass structure and chemical composition (Kästner & Miltner, 2018; Kögel‐Knabner, 2002; Six, Frey, Thiet, & Batten, 2006), possibly resulting in different necromass mineralization rates. The cytoplasmic fraction of microbial tissue is highly labile and may be rapidly taken up by decomposer organisms (Drigo, Anderson, Kannangara, Cairney, & Johnson, 2012; Fernandez, Langley, Chapman, McCormack, & Koide, 2016), and efficiently used to build new biomass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-term persistence of GDGTs could arise from their stabilization by soil minerals at greater soil depths. The amphiphilic nature of lipids, such as GDGTs with both polar and hydrophobic components, promotes the association with mineral surfaces and therefore may afford physical protection from degradation (Jandl et al, 2004;Kleber et al, 2007;von Lützow et al, 2008;Van der Voort et al, 2017). By comparison, in surface soils with high organic matter contents and less availability of reactive mineral surfaces, GDGTs are continuously produced and degraded, which results in a younger mean radiocarbon age and evidence for turnover on decadal timescales (Weijers et al, 2010).…”
Section: Radiocarbon Constraints On the Origin And Turnover Of Gdgts In Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%