2016
DOI: 10.1111/jph.12474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Somatic Hybrids Between Potato and S. berthaultii Show Partial Resistance to Soil‐Borne Fungi and Potato Virus Y

Abstract: Three tetraploid somatic hybrid lines produced by protoplast fusion between a dihaploid potato, Solanum tuberosum, cultivar BF15 and the wild potato species Solanum berthaultii were evaluated here for their response to different soil‐borne pathogens, that is Fusarium solani, Pythium aphanidermatum and Rhizoctonia solani as well as to infection by potato virus Y (PVY). Both hybrid and BF15 plants grown in vitro were inoculated with the tested pathogen strains, that is R. solani, P. aphanidermatum, or F. solani.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These conditions cause sexual incompatibility between S. chacoense and potato and restrict the utilization of the wild species in classical potato breeding (Cho et al 1997;Oritz and Ehlenfeldt 1992). Therefore, protoplast fusion was used with the two different species for crop improvement to overcome this sexual barrier for transferring certain interspecific genes from wild species into potato (Bidani et al 2007;Nouri-Ellouz et al 2016). Interspecific somatic hybrids between wild species such as S. nigrum, S. brevidens, S. phureja, and S. commersonii and potato were successfully produced in potato breeding (Barsby et al 1984;Binding et al 1982;Kim-Lee et al 2005;Putie et al 1986) and this technique has also been applied in between S. tuberosum and S. chaconese (Chen et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These conditions cause sexual incompatibility between S. chacoense and potato and restrict the utilization of the wild species in classical potato breeding (Cho et al 1997;Oritz and Ehlenfeldt 1992). Therefore, protoplast fusion was used with the two different species for crop improvement to overcome this sexual barrier for transferring certain interspecific genes from wild species into potato (Bidani et al 2007;Nouri-Ellouz et al 2016). Interspecific somatic hybrids between wild species such as S. nigrum, S. brevidens, S. phureja, and S. commersonii and potato were successfully produced in potato breeding (Barsby et al 1984;Binding et al 1982;Kim-Lee et al 2005;Putie et al 1986) and this technique has also been applied in between S. tuberosum and S. chaconese (Chen et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The species has been known as one of the important resources for resistance to several important pathogens such as Phytophthora infestans, potato virus Y etc. in potato breeding (Ewing et al 2000;Nouri-Ellouz et al 2016;Park et al 2009;Rauscher et al 2010;Tan et al 2010). On the other hand, sexual incompatibility caused by the different ploidy levels of the genome and endosperm balance number (EBN) between this wild species and potato have restricted the utilization of this wild species for improvements during classical breeding processes (Cho et al 1997;Oritz and Ehlenfeldt 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, sexual incompatibility caused by the different ploidy levels of the genome and endosperm balance number (EBN) between this wild species and potato have restricted the utilization of this wild species for improvements during classical breeding processes (Cho et al 1997;Oritz and Ehlenfeldt 1992). To overcome this sexual barrier for interspecific gene transfer, therefore, protoplast fusion has been attempted with the two different species for crop improvement (Bidani et al 2007;Nouri-Ellouz et al 2016). In potato breeding, this technique has also been applied and succeeded in producing interspecific somatic hybrids such as S. tuberosum (+) S. chaconese (Chen et al 2013), S. tuberosum (+) S. brevidens (Barsby et al 1984), S. tuberosum (+) S. nigrum (Binding et al 1982), S. tuberosum (+) S. phureja (Putie et al 1986) and S. tuberosum (+) S. commersonii (Kim-Lee et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the species is sexually incompatible with S. tuberosum due to different endosperm balance numbers (EBNs) with EBN values of 2 and 4 in S. stoloniferum and S. tuberosum, respectively, although both species are tetraploid (Brown 1988;Singsit and Hanneman 1991;Ortiz and Ehlenfeldt 1992;Cho et al 1997). So, the wild species is difficult to be applied to potato breeding and somatic hybridization could be one of the solutions to overcome sexual barriers for interspecific gene transfer (Bidani et al 2007;Nouri-Ellouz et al 2016) and importance to identify chlorotype with information of chloroplast genome sequences in potato breeding program has increased (Chen et al 2013(Chen et al , 2016Moln ar et al 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2007 ; Nouri-Ellouz et al. 2016 ) and importance to identify chlorotype with information of chloroplast genome sequences in potato breeding program has increased (Chen et al. 2013 , 2016 ; Cho and Park 2016 ; Cho et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%