1999
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Somatic insertions and deletions shape the human antibody repertoire 1 1Edited by J. Karn

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
70
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
8
70
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Apparently functional antibodies belonging to the IGHV3 subgroup with insertions in CDRH1 and CDRH2 leading to CDR-IMGT loop lengths of 9 amino acids have in fact been described by others (8,34,35). As the deletions at position 58 in CDRH2 of both scFv give rise to loop lengths that are used by other members of the IGHV3 subgroup, it is not entirely unexpected that these modifications are tolerated by the scFv frameworks studied here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Apparently functional antibodies belonging to the IGHV3 subgroup with insertions in CDRH1 and CDRH2 leading to CDR-IMGT loop lengths of 9 amino acids have in fact been described by others (8,34,35). As the deletions at position 58 in CDRH2 of both scFv give rise to loop lengths that are used by other members of the IGHV3 subgroup, it is not entirely unexpected that these modifications are tolerated by the scFv frameworks studied here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The insertion of one residue in CDRH1 produces a loop length (CDR1-IMGT length 9 amino acids) that occurs naturally within the human IGHV4, but not the IGHV3 subgroup, and which could correspond to canonical structure 2 as judged by the automatic canonical structure classification. This coexistence of canonical structure 2 in CDRH1 with canonical structure 3 in CDRH2 (Table I) does not occur naturally within the human IGHV germline repertoire, although it has been observed in hypermutated antibodies with insertions in CDRH1 (8). In addition, the structure classification also revealed that a large number of the key residue requirements for canonical structure 2 were not fulfilled (27), i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It has been estimated that approximately 6.5% of native human antibodies contain insertions or deletions within the variable domains as a consequence of SHM (40), and a number of potential mechanisms for their generation via AID-mediated mutagenesis have been proposed (39,41). The identification of multiple, localized codon insertions within CDR regions in this and other affinity maturation programs substantiates this as a robust feature of AID-directed SHM, and another aspect in which the in vivo process can be reproduced in vitro.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall process favors single-base transitions over transversions at an ϳ3:1 ratio (7). Insertions and deletions also occur but are considerably less common (8,9). Certain four-base DNA sequence motifs, called hotspots, are correlated with the mutation locations.…”
Section: Trends In Antibody Sequence Changes During the Somatic Hypermentioning
confidence: 99%