1937
DOI: 10.1093/brain/60.4.389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Somatic Motor and Sensory Representation in the Cerebral Cortex of Man as Studied by Electrical Stimulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

157
2,039
12
53

Year Published

1960
1960
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,682 publications
(2,261 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
157
2,039
12
53
Order By: Relevance
“…1 The technique is su ciently sensitive to reveal mediolateral somatotopic progression on the scalp of proximal to distal muscles in a manner consistent with the known representation of the limb on the motor cortex. 2,3 The areas of the representations of muscles are consistent with ®ndings obtained following direct cortical stimulation, 4,5 yet evidence suggests that reorganization may occur in response to altered a erent input or neurological trauma.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…1 The technique is su ciently sensitive to reveal mediolateral somatotopic progression on the scalp of proximal to distal muscles in a manner consistent with the known representation of the limb on the motor cortex. 2,3 The areas of the representations of muscles are consistent with ®ndings obtained following direct cortical stimulation, 4,5 yet evidence suggests that reorganization may occur in response to altered a erent input or neurological trauma.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…While effector-specific mapping of sensory and motor cortex is well established (Penfield and Boldrey 1949), similar mapping must be evaluated at the premotor cortex, which demonstrated the clearest activation differences in this study. The rostral ventral premotor cortex is an area that has demonstrated involvement in hand actions (Rizzolatti et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For example, Weber (1834Weber ( /1996 found that the perceived distance between two points of a compass changed as he moved them across his skin, feeling farther apart on regions of high tactile sensitivity compared to regions of lower sensitivity. Subsequent studies have replicated this pattern and suggest a systematic relation between perceived tactile distance and the spatial sensitivity of skin surfaces (e.g., Cholewiak, 1999;Taylor-Clarke et al, 2004;Anema, Wolswijk, Ruis, & Dijkerman, 2008;Miller, Longo, & Saygin, 2016), an effect known as Weber's illusion, suggesting that tactile distance perception preserves spatial distortions characteristic of the famous 'Penfield homunculus' (Penfield & Boldrey, 1937).…”
Section: Distortions Of Tactile Distance Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 89%