1985
DOI: 10.1016/0167-0115(85)90202-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Somatostatin and intestinal calcium transport in the rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cumulative CaA under iv SRIF was only slightly lower than that under iv vehicle. This finding differs from previous studies in the rat (Rümenapf and Schwille, 1985) which demonstrated significant inhibition of duodenal CaA at 0.75 g kg' h' of iv SRIF. Since this dose is 5 times higher than that administered in the present study, higher than the chosen SRIF infusion doses might possibly have inhibited CaA in man, a finding which, however, would be not significant for human physiology.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cumulative CaA under iv SRIF was only slightly lower than that under iv vehicle. This finding differs from previous studies in the rat (Rümenapf and Schwille, 1985) which demonstrated significant inhibition of duodenal CaA at 0.75 g kg' h' of iv SRIF. Since this dose is 5 times higher than that administered in the present study, higher than the chosen SRIF infusion doses might possibly have inhibited CaA in man, a finding which, however, would be not significant for human physiology.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Its overall function in the GI tract may be to regulate the intestinal nutrient flux (Schusdziarra, 1980). As SRIF secretion can be stimulated by Ca (Hermansen et al, 1979) and low-dose iv SRIF in the rat lowers CaA (Rümenapf and Schwille, 1985), we hypothesized that SRIF in man might be a hormona! flux regulator also for Ca, being liberated from GI D cells by the absorbed Ca, and conversely decreasing intestinal CaA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation