2015
DOI: 10.1002/cne.23846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Somatostatin in the rat rostral ventrolateral medulla: Origins and mechanism of action

Abstract: Somatostatin (SST) or agonists of the SST-2 receptor (sst2 ) in the rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM) lower sympathetic nerve activity, arterial pressure, and heart rate, or when administered within the Bötzinger region, evoke apneusis. Our aims were to describe the mechanisms responsible for the sympathoinhibitory effects of SST on bulbospinal neurons and to identify likely sources of RVLM SST release. Patch clamp recordings were made from bulbospinal RVLM neurons (n = 31) in brainstem slices prepared from… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…38 The enhancement of PAG activity is also consistent with the critical roles this structure normally plays to compensate for respiratory distress caused by numerous physiological challenges and also in enhancing arousal. 22,46,49,50 The pontine raphe nucleus was the only raphe nucleus that showed significantly increased activity when fluoxetine selectively blocked S-IRA, but the basis for this selective effect is unclear and needs to be investigated further. This is consistent with recent evidence indicating that this compensatory role of the PAG may be deficient in DBA/1 mice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…38 The enhancement of PAG activity is also consistent with the critical roles this structure normally plays to compensate for respiratory distress caused by numerous physiological challenges and also in enhancing arousal. 22,46,49,50 The pontine raphe nucleus was the only raphe nucleus that showed significantly increased activity when fluoxetine selectively blocked S-IRA, but the basis for this selective effect is unclear and needs to be investigated further. This is consistent with recent evidence indicating that this compensatory role of the PAG may be deficient in DBA/1 mice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…49 This pattern of activation is proposed to be critical to the ability of fluoxetine to prevent the seizure from inducing terminal apnea, as such increase was not seen with fluoxetine when seizure was not evoked. Other respiratory structures, including the nucleus of the solitary tract, parabrachial, and hypoglossal nucleus, may also become involved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its actions include increased locomotor activity (Viollet et al, 2008), memory and learning (Vecsei and Widerlov, 1988; Gastambide et al, 2009), and sleep (Steiger, 2007; Xu et al, 2015), as well as changes in autonomic cardiovascular and gastric functions (e.g., sympatho-inhibitory effect with lowering of heart rate and blood pressure, stimulation of gastric secretion and transit) (Brown and Taché, 1981; Martinez et al, 2000; Bou Farah et al, 2016), immune functions (Gonzalez-Rey et al, 2015) and ingestive behaviors (e.g., increased feeding and drinking; Stengel et al, 2015). Of importance in relation with stress, injection of somatostatin into the brain influences emotional processes exerting anxiolytic and anti-depressant effects (Engin and Treit, 2009; Scheich et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both antibodies have been extensively characterized by western and dotblot assay; neither label sst 2 knockout animals, and the rabbit antibody selectively labels HEK cells transfected with sst 2 (Schulz et al, ; Korner et al, ; Fischer et al, ). As recently described, binding of both antisera is blocked by preabsorption with the sst 2a antigen, and overlaps completely in tissue incubated with both primary antibodies, visualized with different fluorescent secondary antibodies (Bou Farah et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 83%