1981
DOI: 10.1152/jn.1981.45.1.137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Somatotopic organization of hindlimb cutaneous dorsal root projections to cat dorsal horn.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also tabulated degeneration data available at the time and showed that presence of overlap between a dorsal root dermatome and a segmental representation was a good predictor of projection of the dorsal root to the dorsal horn segment. This was con® rmed and extended by the work of Brown and Culberson (1981), who showed not only that rostrocaudal extents of dorsal root projections were consistent with the notion that preand postsynaptic somatotopy are in register, but also that the relative mediolateral positions of the rostral extension of the S 1 projection and the caudal extension of the L 5 projection were best explained in terms of presynaptic somatotopy. Brown (1980, 1982) extended these observations to the level of single cutaneous nerves, showing that pairs of nerves had relative mediolateral and rostrocaudal positions predictable on the basis of presynaptic somatotopy, and degrees of separation or overlap which matched their innervation ® elds' separation or overlap.…”
Section: Lines Of Evidencesupporting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They also tabulated degeneration data available at the time and showed that presence of overlap between a dorsal root dermatome and a segmental representation was a good predictor of projection of the dorsal root to the dorsal horn segment. This was con® rmed and extended by the work of Brown and Culberson (1981), who showed not only that rostrocaudal extents of dorsal root projections were consistent with the notion that preand postsynaptic somatotopy are in register, but also that the relative mediolateral positions of the rostral extension of the S 1 projection and the caudal extension of the L 5 projection were best explained in terms of presynaptic somatotopy. Brown (1980, 1982) extended these observations to the level of single cutaneous nerves, showing that pairs of nerves had relative mediolateral and rostrocaudal positions predictable on the basis of presynaptic somatotopy, and degrees of separation or overlap which matched their innervation ® elds' separation or overlap.…”
Section: Lines Of Evidencesupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The sizes and shapes of dorsal horn cell RFs vary as a function of RF location, and therefore as a function of cell location in the map (Brown et al, 1975). RFs are smallest on the toes, increasing rapidly in area up to the distal calf, and remaining constant or declining slightly at more proximal locations.…”
Section: Somatotopic Gradients and Geometries Of Dorsal Horn Cell Rfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is ample anatomical evidence demonstrating that primary afferent fibres entering the spinal cord synapse in the dorsal horn at other spinal levels (Wall & Werman, 1976;Brown & Culberson, 1981). In cats, fibres entering the dorsal horn in the lower cervical regions can spread fourteen spinal segments (Imai & Kusama, 1969).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanically sensitive afferent fibres from muscle can be excited by passive muscle stretch, eliciting a rise in blood pressure and heart rate with little or no stimulation of the metabolically sensitive afferents (Kaufman & Rybicki, 1987;Stebbins, Brown, Levin & Longhurst, 1988 (Wilson, Wall, Matsukawa & Mitchell, 1992 (Spague & Ha, 1964;Imai & Kusama, 1969;Wall & Werman, 1976;Brown & Culberson, 1981;McNeil, Westlund & Coggeshall, 1989). In addition, we have shown that NMDA receptors in levels of the spinal cord adjacent to the L7 region are involved in the pressor response to muscle contraction and stretch (Hand et al 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%