2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2015.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sombras y sombras en la aplicación de la ley de dependencia

Abstract: The aim of this study was to provide a brief overview of the most controversial aspects of the Spanish Act of Promotion of Personal Autonomy and Long-Term Care 39/2006, which, in the last few years, has led to heated debates between the state and the autonomous regions. Because of the funding problems due to initial poor planning, the decline of contributions from the Spanish Government in the last few years, including the suppression of the agreed level, and low cash collection from the user through copayment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During this period, numerous jobs were destroyed, the working conditions of workers became precarious, and poverty and social inequality increased and the Welfare State did not give a proper answer to these social dynamics. Statistics and research show that the economic subsidy of care (hereinafter, cash-for-care) was the most granted resource (SAAD, several years; Correa & Jiménez-Aguilera, 2016; Deusdad, Comas-d’Argemir, & Dziegielewski, 2016; Martínez-López, 2017) in the family environment for the support to non-professional caregivers since the implementation of the SAAD. Despite this, the law itself states, specifically article 14, that services of the agency’s catalogue will be a priority and that cash-for-care will be exceptional.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During this period, numerous jobs were destroyed, the working conditions of workers became precarious, and poverty and social inequality increased and the Welfare State did not give a proper answer to these social dynamics. Statistics and research show that the economic subsidy of care (hereinafter, cash-for-care) was the most granted resource (SAAD, several years; Correa & Jiménez-Aguilera, 2016; Deusdad, Comas-d’Argemir, & Dziegielewski, 2016; Martínez-López, 2017) in the family environment for the support to non-professional caregivers since the implementation of the SAAD. Despite this, the law itself states, specifically article 14, that services of the agency’s catalogue will be a priority and that cash-for-care will be exceptional.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Noble et al (2012) suggest, not all older people will have savings to pay for private care services. In addition, in present-day Spain there are insufficient resources for this demand to be covered by social services, a problem that was exacerbated after the adoption of austerity measures implemented by the government and affecting health-care provisions that had been stipulated by the 2006 Dependency Law (Correa and Jiménez-Aguilera, 2016;Deusdad et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implementation had to coordinate the participation of state, regional, and local actors, together with private companies, all of which did not always share the same interests [26]. This development has caused important situations of inequality in waiting times for the dependency assessment by the professionals designated by the administration, for Individualized Care Plans, and for receiving benefits and/or services-between different Autonomous Regions [2,27] and within a region. All this is reflected in the interviews conducted with the assessors from the region of Extremadura.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%