1963
DOI: 10.1021/jm00342a050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some 2-Substituted Aminopurines and Purine Analogs1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6-Amino-2-chloropurine ( 3 ), when reacted with ethanolamine, afforded 6-amino-2-[(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]purine ( 5 ), the structure of which was confirmed by 1 H and 13 C NMR (including DEPT 135 exp), MS, and elemental analysis, although our melting point and UV maxima differed from those reported in the literature …”
Section: Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 40%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…6-Amino-2-chloropurine ( 3 ), when reacted with ethanolamine, afforded 6-amino-2-[(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]purine ( 5 ), the structure of which was confirmed by 1 H and 13 C NMR (including DEPT 135 exp), MS, and elemental analysis, although our melting point and UV maxima differed from those reported in the literature …”
Section: Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 40%
“…5 : decolorized and crystallized from water; yield 51%; mp 259−260 °C (differs from that given in the literature, 247−248 °C or over 300 °C 8 ); likewise UV λ max (pH 1) 245 (sh), 289, (pH 13) 290 disagree with previously described results, i.e., water (pH 1.1) 249, 298, water (pH 12.4) 263 (sh), 286; MS and NMR spectra are in accordance with the proposed structure; MS (AEI-MS 902) 194 (M + , 21),163 (100), 150 (26), 134 (42), 121 (11); 1 H NMR (270 MHz, DMSO) 3.30 (2H, t, J = 6.0, CH 2 ), 3.48 (2H, t, J = 6.0, CH 2 ), 4.67 (1H, br s, exch with D 2 O, OH), 6.02 (1H, t, J = 5.0, exch with D 2 O, NH), 6.64 (2H, s, exch with D 2 O, NH 2 ), 7.67 (1H, s, H-8), 12.14 (1H, br s, exch with D 2 O, H-9). Anal.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analysis of chemical modification possibilities suggests adenine substitution at the C8 position is the most facile. Therefore, we first obtained 8-bromoadenine (8BrA) from adenine, then transformed 8BrA into 6-amino-7­( H )-purine-8­(9 H )-thione (8SA), and finally converted 8SA to 8-methylthioadenine . Designing this potentially radiosensitive derivative, i.e., a system of high susceptibility to DEA, we considered the Hammett inductive constant of a substituent (for the −SCH 3 group it amounts to 0.25, which implies that such a modification of adenine should lead to thermodynamically stable radical anion).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we first obtained 8-bromoadenine (8BrA) from adenine, then transformed 8BrA into 6-amino-7( H )-purine-8(9 H )-thione (8SA), and finally converted 8SA to 8-methylthioadenine. 18 Designing this potentially radiosensitive derivative, i.e., a system of high susceptibility to DEA, we considered the Hammett inductive constant of a substituent (for the −SCH 3 group it amounts to 0.25, 19 which implies that such a modification of adenine should lead to thermodynamically stable radical anion 20 ). Additionally, the S–C bond energy is similar to that of the C–Br bond, suggesting, thus, a low-barrier dissociation, 21 a second requirement for efficient DEA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%