1915
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.1.2830.546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some a Priori Pathometric Equations

Abstract: IN tlle second edition of my book on the Prevention of Maltaia (Murray, 1911) I publislhed a considerable amount of worli (whiclh had occupied me for a long time) on wlhat may be called patlhometry that is, the matheematical study of epidemiology. In these studies I followed the a priori metlhod: in othler words, I assioned a knowledge of the fundamental laws governing the timYre-to-tiine variations of disease in a populatioln of living creatures; formed the corresponding difference-and differential-equatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
76
0
3

Year Published

1984
1984
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
76
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The irony lies in the fact that Brownlee was the major proponent of the theory of changes in disease infectivity during the course of epidemic cycles. Brownlee's hypothesis was in direct conflict with earlier work by William Hamer (Hamer, 1906) and Ronald Ross (Ross, 1908(Ross, , 1911(Ross, , 1915(Ross, , 1916(Ross, , 1917, both of whom believed that the so-called 'mass action' principle of transmission (the idea that the net rate of spread is dependent on the density of infectious people times the density of susceptible individuals) explained the regular recurrence of measles epidemics. Although instrumental in providing statistical evidence for the regularity of recurrent epidemics (employing the 'method of periodograms'; see Brownlee, 1918), the demise of Brownlee's theory of infectivity followed shortly after his death in 1927.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The irony lies in the fact that Brownlee was the major proponent of the theory of changes in disease infectivity during the course of epidemic cycles. Brownlee's hypothesis was in direct conflict with earlier work by William Hamer (Hamer, 1906) and Ronald Ross (Ross, 1908(Ross, , 1911(Ross, , 1915(Ross, , 1916(Ross, , 1917, both of whom believed that the so-called 'mass action' principle of transmission (the idea that the net rate of spread is dependent on the density of infectious people times the density of susceptible individuals) explained the regular recurrence of measles epidemics. Although instrumental in providing statistical evidence for the regularity of recurrent epidemics (employing the 'method of periodograms'; see Brownlee, 1918), the demise of Brownlee's theory of infectivity followed shortly after his death in 1927.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…O século XX assistiria à revolução quantitativa em epidemiologia. Ross 15 , no início do século já iniciara a formulação dos primeiros modelos matemáticos. Durante os anos '20 e '30 este aperfeiçoamento ganha corpo com os trabalhos de Frost e Reed 17 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…In recent years, transmission models have been used extensively to study epidemic and endemic infectious disease processes for a wide array of infectious diseases such as measles, tuberculosis, and more recently human immunodeficiency virus infection (5). In general, these models follow the postulate of Ross and Hamer that the rate at which susceptible individuals within a population become infected (the transmission rate) is proportional to both the current number of infectious and current number of susceptible individuals (7). Surprisingly, despite the increase in the use of disease transmission models to study infectious disease processes and despite the known, massive public health problems associated with infectious diarrhea and gastrointestinal illness worldwide, few publications have examined disease transmission through waterborne pathogens.…”
Section: The Use Of Mathematical Models As Tools For Public Health Pomentioning
confidence: 99%