22nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting 1984
DOI: 10.2514/6.1984-562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some aerodynamic considerations for advanced aircraft configurations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a common problem for T-tail configurations where the turbulent wake from the stalled main wing blankets the tailplane and elevator, making pitch control inert. It can also be encountered in certain situations on other aircraft configurations with a rearwards centre of mass, and on canard configurations where the aft wing stalls, forcing the aircraft to pitch up and push the canard into stall (7) . A similar process between an F-16's wing and strakes would lead it to deep stall between 50 and 60°degrees angle-of-attack (8) Figure 2 illustrates that in a stall the aircraft becomes longitudinally unstable (where the gradient of the C m -α plot becomes positive).…”
Section: Deep Stallingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a common problem for T-tail configurations where the turbulent wake from the stalled main wing blankets the tailplane and elevator, making pitch control inert. It can also be encountered in certain situations on other aircraft configurations with a rearwards centre of mass, and on canard configurations where the aft wing stalls, forcing the aircraft to pitch up and push the canard into stall (7) . A similar process between an F-16's wing and strakes would lead it to deep stall between 50 and 60°degrees angle-of-attack (8) Figure 2 illustrates that in a stall the aircraft becomes longitudinally unstable (where the gradient of the C m -α plot becomes positive).…”
Section: Deep Stallingmentioning
confidence: 99%