Some animals are more equal than others: Validation of a new scale to measure how attitudes to animals depend on species and human purpose of use

Abstract

Globally, many millions of animals are used by humans every year and much of this usage causes public concern. A new scale, devised to measure attitudes to animal use in relation to the purpose of use and species, the Animal Purpose Questionnaire (APQ), was completed by in total 483 participants, 415 British nationals and 68 participants from 39 other countries. The APQ was presented in two survey formats, alongside an established Animal Attitudes Scale (AAS). In both surveys, participants also provided demographic details to provide a context to their attitudes to animals. As might be expected, and consistent with the validity of the new scale, overall scores on the AAS and APQ were highly correlated. However, the APQ provided a more differentiated measure of attitudes to animal use across a variety of settings. The results showed that there was overall higher levels of agreement with the use of animals in medical research and basic science, less endorsement for food production and pest control, and the use of animals for other cultural practices was generally disapproved of, irrespective of species. Participants overall disagreed with the use of rabbits, monkeys, badgers, tree shrews (survey 1), chimpanzees, dogs, dolphins and parrots (survey 2), but were neutral about the use of rats, mice, pigs, octopus, chickens, zebrafish (survey 1), carp, chickens, pigs, pigeons, rabbits and rats (survey 2). Interactions between species and purpose were largely driven by the consideration of using diverse species for food production. In general, females and vegetarians expressed less agreement with the use of animals with some differences by purpose of use. Pet keeping consistently predicted reduced willingness to use animals for basic science (only). The APQ provides a new tool to unpack how public attitudes depend on the intersectionality of demographics, species and purpose of use.

Effects of Occult Hypoperfusion on Local Circulation and Inflammation - An Analysis in a Standardized Polytrauma Model

“…Based on the standardized trauma and standardized resuscitation the effect should be investigated on an epigenetic level, since it might be based on an individual reaction to the injury. One might argue that the translation of our results to routine clinical practice might be lacking, however, large animals mirror human physiology better when compared with rodents ( 35 ). For those reasons, a certain translation of our results might be feasible.…”

Social context of the brain and law: Is consciousness social?

“…Neuroscience, as it seems, doesn't discriminate on the basis of colour as it is focused on the brain, though it is a different story that whose brain it is studying. There was case when racial discrimination was observed to be processed unintentionally in the brain, while social decision making and attitude formation, between black and white social categories (see Bradley et al, 2020) and how unintentionally race attitude affects legal decision making (see Kubota, Banaji & Phelps, 2012;Matten, Wei, Cloutier & Kubota, 2018). Neuroscience doesn't talk about mysteries of the brain but it reveals something which was unknown earlier and correlates with the intention and behaviour.…”

Should Animal Welfare be Included in Educational Programs? Attitudes of Secondary and University Students from Eight EU Countries

“…using an 11 points Likert-type scale ranging from 0 (not worried at all) to 10 (completely worried). Several studies highlighted the importance of analyzing the attitude towards AW depending on the animal species involved (Bradley, Mennie, Bibby, & Cassaday, 2020). Some studies showed that there is a significant positive relationship between knowledge about specific animal species and responsible environmental' attitudes (Bjerke et al 2001;Randler et al, 2005).…”