1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf00683607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some aspects of the effect of gravity on the superfluid transition in4He

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One might thus expect the transition to become smeared. This is what appears to be found for the liquidgas transition in a gravitational field [4,5,6], which does, however, present a physically different situation [7]. For the FM case we find that the transition remains sharp in a well-defined sense with mean-field critical behavior, even though the magnetization M (x) is position dependent and hence "smeared" in some sense [8,9].…”
supporting
confidence: 73%
“…One might thus expect the transition to become smeared. This is what appears to be found for the liquidgas transition in a gravitational field [4,5,6], which does, however, present a physically different situation [7]. For the FM case we find that the transition remains sharp in a well-defined sense with mean-field critical behavior, even though the magnetization M (x) is position dependent and hence "smeared" in some sense [8,9].…”
supporting
confidence: 73%
“…Thus there will be a gravity-induced averaging of thermophysical measurements very near the transition in a sample of finite height. In cells at constant temperature, there will be a region near T where superfluid and normal fluid 4 He will coexist ͑Ahlers, 1968a͑Ahlers, , 1991 For example, even for a superfluid sample of only 0.5 mm in height in 1g, this coexisting region will occur over a temperature range of 6.4ϫ 10 −8 K. To the extent that local properties can be measured within a cell, of course, the above limitation does not apply. For example, in thermal conductivity measurements this effect is less restrictive because the thermal gradient stratifies the column of helium, permitting local measurements that are not rounded by the pressure gradient across the entire sample ͑Day et al, 1998͒.…”
Section: Gravity Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the horizontal scales differ by a factor of 4000. From Ahlers, 1999. adjustable parameters. Over the range shown, the match is very good.…”
Section: Microgravity Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small bulk thermal conductivity cell, called a "lambda device", was attached to the bottom (hot) copper plate for the determination of T λ in bulk helium. The bottom of the lambda device was 1.25 cm below that of the confinement cell, and as a result the value of T λ had to be corrected for the hydrostatic pressure difference between the bottom of the lambda device and the middle of the MCP [9,10]. Since the lambda device was attached to the bottom plate, it could only be used before and after a data acquisition sequence because the heat applied to it necessarily flowed through the confining cell.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%